Abstract
In this paper we present our observations of how seven criminal intelligence analysts use inference making and storytelling to create explanations. Adapting the Critical Decision Method, we observe they engage in a process of anchoring to gain traction and initiate further inquires; they engage in a laddering process, where they develop explanations to extend or elaborate their ideas that create bridges to new understanding; and they complement their anchoring and laddering activities by associative questioning to discover what other associations exists. These un-intended associations can lead to insights, or generate new patterns recognisable by intuition. We envisage a better understanding of how analyst think and reason might help design software that encourages insight.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
