Abstract

This paper examines what research with children can do and become when it intra-acts with a MeToo hashtag, creative methods, experiences of sexual harassment and the making and travelling of Valentine’s Day cards. The paper is grounded within a creative research-activist project, #MeToo Postscriptum, which aimed to address sexual harassment in pre-teen peer cultures. Analyzing the project, the paper explores how the idea of response-ability manifested in three space-times of the project, and how the material-discursive practices of the project reiteratively reconfigured the conditions of possibilities to respond, react, and act against abusive gendered and sexual child peer cultures. Mapping response-ability through our research endeavours helps theorize the contingent, complex, and entangled ways research-activist methodologies can activate change, enables us to envision response-able practices to counter sexual harassment in young peer cultures, and sensitizes us as scholars and educators to our responsibilities and accountabilities that become recrafted in response.

Highlights

  • This paper is inspired by the recent theoretical-methodological calls by feminist posthuman and new materialist scholars for political and affirmative modes of inquiry (Braidotti, 2013; Strom & Martin, 2017; Åsberg & Braidotti, 2018)

  • We explore how response-ability became manifested in the material-discursive practices of our research-activist project and how such practices reiteratively reconfigured conditions of possibilities to respond, react, and act against abusive gendered and sexual pre-teen peer cultures

  • We examine how the embodied experiences of sexual harassment were reiteratively reconfigured through the intra-active entanglements of children and Valentine’s Day cards, and we explore how the children’s creations elicited further invitations to respond as they merged with the wider constellations of change-making

Read more

Summary

Introduction

This paper is inspired by the recent theoretical-methodological calls by feminist posthuman and new materialist scholars for political and affirmative modes of inquiry (Braidotti, 2013; Strom & Martin, 2017; Åsberg & Braidotti, 2018). The paper draws inspiration from educational research that seeks to actively open up to the potentials of change and transformation, in research on the gendered and sexual peer relations of young people (Renold, 2018; Renold & Ringrose, 2019). This scholarly work within the growing “PhEmaterialist” collective (Niccolini, Zarabadi, & Ringrose, 2018; Osgood & Robinson, Reconceptualizing Educational Research Methodology 2019, 2,3(2) Special Issue https://journals.hioa.no/index.php/rerm/issue/view/397. Response-ability is underscored by the genealogies of feminist ethicopolitics in the practices of knowledge production on the one hand and the post-individual, posthuman onto-epistemologies of decentred agency and relationality on the other

Objectives
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call