Abstract

Given increasing economic affluence, improvement in housing conditions and population decline in the last three decades, Romanians should be more likely to experience better housing than ever before, particularly in terms of the availability and affordability of space. But substantial improvement alongside numerous people still suffering poor conditions begs the important question of who has benefited and who has been excluded. Engaging the theoretical framework of diverse economies and drawing on 2007 and 2018 Eurostat-SILC micro-data, we examine the realignment between housing and income stratification across a proposed housing typology that reflects historically enduring arrangements of housing provisions and economic hierarchies. We find that residents’ socioeconomic profiles differ significantly by type of housing (e.g. showing surprising economic prosperity in urban flats and extreme poverty in some rural houses), which positions our typology as an expression of housing stratification. Furthermore, multivariate analyses highlight the increasingly stronger relationship between income and housing consumption over the decade. Of concern, a large share of the population (the bottom 40% of the income distribution) has fallen further into housing disadvantage after controlling for overall improvements in housing conditions. Conversely, the relative distance between middle- and higher-income households has decreased; given the dominance of small dwellings in the housing stock, higher-income groups seem unable to transfer their financial gains into space in their main residence except a minority engaged in the self-provision of ‘villas’. These patterns of housing stratification indicate a move towards a 40%/60% ‘hour-glass’ society if housing continues to remain outside the political agenda.

Highlights

  • Three decades have passed since the fall of communism, most Eastern Bloc’s countries being full members of the European Union (EU)

  • In model 3 we explore whether the diverse economies of housing provision have contributed to trends in housing stratification, by adding the interaction between our housing typology and time

  • We looked at socioeconomic stratification by income quintiles and at housing stratification by two dimensions: our housing typology, reflecting historically enduring arrangements of housing provisions and economic hierarchies; and the availability and affordability of space

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Three decades have passed since the fall of communism, most Eastern Bloc’s countries being full members of the European Union (EU). While historic non-capitalist forms of housing provisions and households’ occupancy-practices had historically ensured a roof over one’s head and perhaps weakened income inequalities (Berescu 2019), over the last decade lower-income households have consistently benefited less from improvements in housing conditions, being increasingly unable to access decent or any housing at all. This is true for the poorest and most excluded in Romanian society, but extends to the bottom 40% of the income distribution

Housing stratification in Romania
Diverse economic practices
Romanian diverse economies of housing provision
Operationalizing housing stratification
The research
Variables
Method
Descriptive results
The ‘overall’ picture
Income‐effects by housing type
Findings
Concluding discussion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call