Abstract

The Universal Declaration of Human Rights recognises stable housing as a prerequisite for an adequate standard of living. A home provides shelter and enables personal development, thus contributing to the individual’s well-being. Despite this, however, many struggle to find a place to live. In the Netherlands, people with a history of criminal or anti-social behaviour (‘ex-offenders’) are among those whose search for housing is most problematic. They are sometimes viewed as unreliable tenants or denied access to housing out of fear for recidivism. At the same time, Dutch local authorities—responsible for maintaining public order—may (aim to) prevent an ex-offender from (re) settling in their municipality. Recent legislation in the Netherlands furthermore allows local authorities to screen and exclude people from certain urban areas based on their past behaviour. How do Dutch private and administrative actors decide between ex-offenders’ housing rights on the one hand and other persons’ (feelings of) safety and public order on the other? And how do the laws and policies in the Netherlands concerning the housing of ex-offenders relate to the state’s human rights obligations? Using doctrinal legal research methods and applying a normative, human rights framework, this paper concludes that while there are no out-right violations of fundamental rights and freedoms, several approaches in the Netherlands do appear to be problematic and at odds with international obligations.

Highlights

  • According to the 1948 Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR), having access to housing is a prerequisite for an adequate standard of living

  • In order to determine to what extent private and administrative law in the Netherlands balances the rights and interests of both the ex-offender and his or her neighbours, this paper examines Dutch law and policies from a human rights perspective

  • The objective of this paper is threefold. It aims to build on existing descriptive, doctrinal legal theory (Wacks 2017, pp. 6–7) by examining the Dutch legal framework concerning the housing of ex-offenders

Read more

Summary

Introduction

According to the 1948 Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR), having access to housing is a prerequisite for an adequate standard of living. Everyone should be able to live “somewhere in security, peace and dignity” (CESCR 1991, para. 7). In the Netherlands, people with a criminal record or a history of anti-social behaviour are among those whose search for housing is most problematic. A lack of a fixed address, for example, affects the chances of securing an income by reducing the probability of the ex-offender finding a job (Bushway et al 2007) It frustrates the ex-offender’s efforts to conquer alcohol or drug addiction (Nelson et al 2011). With regard to landlords’ attitudes towards rental applicants with a background of criminal or anti-social behaviour there is little data available as well It is, assumed that such a history stigmatises the ex-offender in a way that it affects his or her chances of finding a home The (extended) Urban Areas Special Measures Act allows for the exclusion of people on the basis of their (lack of) income as well as their past criminal or anti-social conduct

Objectives and Research Methods
A Final Analysis
Findings
Discussion and Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call