Abstract

Vietnam has pilot-tested a payment for forest environmental services (PFES) program in an effort to restore and protect forest areas, some of which have been severely degraded by the excessive cutting of trees by small-scale farmers planting annual crops on steep, sloping lands. The pilot program implemented in southern Vietnam seems to be successful, yet the program in northern Vietnam has not produced the desired rates of planting and maintaining forest areas. The reasons for these mixed results include differences in socio-economic characteristics and also the production and marketing opportunities available to rural households in the project areas. To gain insight regarding program participation, we examine the household-level opportunity costs of planting and ­maintaining small plots of forest trees in northern Vietnam. We find that small-scale farmers in Hoa Binh Province, with limited financial resources, prefer the annual revenue stream provided by crops such as maize and cassava, rather than waiting for 7 years to obtain revenue from a forest planting. Farmers in Son La Province, with limited access to markets, prefer annual crops because they are not able to sell bamboo shoots and other forest products harvested from their small plots. In both provinces, the payments offered for planting and maintaining forest trees are smaller than the opportunity costs of planting and harvesting annual crops. Thus, most households likely would choose not to participate in the PFES program, at current payment rates, if given the opportunity to decline.

Highlights

  • Forest degradation impairs the quality of forest ecosystem services, which include watershed protection, biodiversity conservation, tourism, carbon sequestration, and landscape beauty (Briner et al 2013; Muhamad et al 2013, 2014; Barber et al 2014; Balthazar et al 2015)

  • Vietnam has pilot-tested a payment for forest environmental services (PFES) program in an effort to restore and protect forest areas, some of which have been severely degraded by the excessive cutting of trees by small-scale farmers planting annual crops on steep, sloping lands

  • As forest production can generate income for farmers in Da Bac, and while maize production leads to soil degradation, it might be more feasible to promote forest production in Da Bac than in Moc Chau, even though a higher PFES payment presently is available in Moc Chau

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Forest degradation impairs the quality of forest ecosystem services, which include watershed protection, biodiversity conservation, tourism, carbon sequestration, and landscape beauty (Briner et al 2013; Muhamad et al 2013, 2014; Barber et al 2014; Balthazar et al 2015). Programs that promote the payment for ecosystem services in forested areas have been implemented in several countries (Wunder 2008; McElwee 2012; Suhardiman et al 2013; Huong et al 2014; McElwee et al 2014) Such programs link beneficiaries (those who pay for the services) with farmers and other users of natural resources (the providers of the services) through systems of conditional payments (Wunder 2005; WertzKanounnikoff and Rankine 2008). In settings with well-defined property rights and low transaction costs, PES programs have the potential to be more successful than command-and-control approaches in reducing environmental degradation in upland areas of lower income countries (Neef and Thomas 2009). PES programs might not succeed in areas with insecure property rights, where smallholders have limited trust in public officials, or where the capacity to monitor and enforce land use regulations is inadequate (George et al 2009)

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call