Abstract

Agricultural adaptation to climate change is critical for ensuring future food security. Social capital is important for climate change adaptation, but institutions and social networks at multiple scales (e.g., household, community, and institution) have been overlooked in studying agricultural climate change adaptation. We combine data from 13 sites in 11 low-income countries in East Africa, West Africa, and South Asia to explore how multiple scales of social capital relate to household food security outcomes among smallholder farmers. Using social network theory, we define three community organizational social network types (fragmented defined by lack of coordination, brokered defined as having a strong central actor, or shared defined by high coordination) and examine household social capital through group memberships. We find community and household social capital are positively related, with higher household group membership more likely in brokered and shared networks. Household group membership is associated with more than a 10% reduction in average months of food insecurity, an effect moderated by community social network type. In communities with fragmented and shared organizational networks, additional household group memberships is associated with consistent decreases in food insecurity, in some cases up to two months; whereas in brokered networks, reductions in food insecurity are only associated with membership in credit groups. These effects are confirmed by hierarchical random effects models, which control for demographic factors. This suggests that multiple scales of social capital—both within and outside the household—are correlated with household food security. This social capital may both be bridging (across groups) and bonding (within groups) with different implications for how social capital structure affects food security. Efforts to improve food security could recognize the potential for both household and community level social networks and collaboration, which further research can capture by analyzing multiple scales of social capital data.

Highlights

  • Climate change impacts on food and agriculture systems are projected in the future, but are already felt at multiple scales (Moore and Lobell, 2015; Ramankutty and Iizumi, 2016; Hoffman et al, 2017; Fuller et al, 2018)

  • In support of H1, we find that higher community social capital is correlated with higher individual household social capital

  • We find evidence that both household and community social capital are related to household food security, but that there are important interactions between social capital at these different scales

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Climate change impacts on food and agriculture systems are projected in the future, but are already felt at multiple scales (Moore and Lobell, 2015; Ramankutty and Iizumi, 2016; Hoffman et al, 2017; Fuller et al, 2018). We leverage a unique global dataset from the CGIAR Research Program on Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security (CCAFS) that has assessed climate change adaptation and agricultural development organizations and households around the world, and build on existing studies that have characterized and quantified multiple levels of social capital in each CCAFS research site (Niles and Brown, 2017; Rudnick et al, 2019). To our knowledge, this is the largest study of its type to collect and link data across multiple regions and villages, at both the individual and community levels, to assess social capital and food security

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call