Abstract

One of the greatest threats to public health is personal exposure to air pollution from indoor sources. The impact of air pollution on mortality and morbidity globally and in South Africa is large and places a burden on healthcare systems for treatment and care of air pollution-related diseases. Household air pollution (HAP) exposure attributed to the burning of solid fuels for cooking and heating is associated with several adverse health impacts including impacts on the respiratory system. The researchers sought to update the South African evidence on HAP exposure and respiratory health outcomes from 2005. Our quasi-systematic review produced 27 eligible studies, however, only four of these studies considered measures of both HAP exposure and respiratory health outcomes. While all of the studies that were reviewed show evidence of the serious problem of HAP and possible association with negative health outcomes in South Africa, no studies provided critically important information for South Africa, namely, local estimates of relative risks that may be applied in burden of disease studies and concentration response functions for criteria pollutants. Almost all of the studies that were reviewed were cross-sectional, observational studies. To strengthen the evidence of HAP exposure-health outcome impacts on respiratory health, researchers need to pursue studies such as cohort, time-series and randomised intervention trials, among other study designs. South African and other researchers working in this field need to work together and take a leap towards a new era of epidemiological research that uses more sophisticated methods and analyses to provide the best possible evidence. This evidence may then be used with greater confidence to motivate for policy-making, contribute to international processes such as for guideline development, and ultimately strengthen the evidence for design of interventions that will reduce HAP and the burden of disease associated with exposure to HAP in South Africa.

Highlights

  • While episodes of unusually high air pollution attract attention and public health concern, the greatest damage to public health is associated with long-term exposure to air pollution (HEI 2017)

  • None of the studies measured household air pollution (HAP), instead, they used indicators or proxies for exposure, such as presence of environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) and fuel used for cooking and / heating in the home

  • While crosssectional studies are typically less expensive and easier to implement compared to other epidemiological study designs, the data produced from cross-sectional studies is not as useful and the lack of randomisation, among other shortfalls, prohibits generalisation

Read more

Summary

Introduction

While episodes of unusually high air pollution attract attention and public health concern, the greatest damage to public health is associated with long-term exposure to air pollution (HEI 2017). Outdoor and indoor personal exposure to air pollution, combined, comprise the largest environmental risk factor for mortality, responsible for 6.4 million deaths in 2015 (11% of global deaths) (Cohen et al 2017). The costs of air pollution in Africa are high - estimated at around USD450 billion in 2013 (Roy 2016). The economic impacts include life years lost, increased healthcare (and subsequent demand on government) and lost worker productivity due to air pollution impacts on health. Epidemiological studies and systemic reviews have shown associations between exposure to household air pollution (HAP) and a variety of diseases and symptoms (Jedrychowski et al 2017; Tanaka et al 2012; Koo et al 2011; Pope et al 2010). The indoor environment represents an important microenvironment in which people spend approximately 90% of their time each day (WHO 2014a)

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call