Abstract

The literature on Congress offers no systematic analysis of representatives' communications with their constituents. This paper argues that such communications constitute an important linkage between representative and represented and, as such, are indicators of House members' interelection reelection strategies. Mayhew's categories of member activities were used for classifying communication styles in House members' newsletters and press releases; however, in order to delineate styles which discriminate among members in different electoral circumstances, it proved necessary to modify those categories to include consideration of geographic focus. The distinction between nationally oriented and locally oriented position taking was found to be particularly important. Thus, communication style was found to be a function of district and member characteristics; more ideologically extreme members from affluent suburban districts emphasize position taking on national issues; while relatively senior members from poor districts tend to present a particularized credit-claiming style.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call