Abstract

BackgroundHouse fly larvae (Musca domestica L.) require a live microbial community to successfully develop. Cattle manure is rich in organic matter and microorganisms, comprising a suitable substrate for larvae who feed on both the decomposing manure and the prokaryotic and eukaryotic microbes therein. Microbial communities change as manure ages, and when fly larvae are present changes attributable to larval grazing also occur. Here, we used high throughput sequencing of 16S and 18S rRNA genes to characterize microbial communities in dairy cattle manure and evaluated the changes in those communities over time by comparing the communities in fresh manure to aged manure with or without house fly larvae.ResultsBacteria, archaea and protist community compositions significantly differed across manure types (e.g. fresh, aged, larval-grazed). Irrespective of manure type, microbial communities were dominated by the following phyla: Euryarchaeota (Archaea); Proteobacteria, Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes (Bacteria); Ciliophora, Metamonanda, Ochrophyta, Apicomplexa, Discoba, Lobosa and Cercozoa (Protists). Larval grazing significantly reduced the abundances of Bacteroidetes, Ciliophora, Cercozoa and increased the abundances of Apicomplexa and Discoba. Manure aging alone significantly altered the abundance bacteria (Acinetobacter, Clostridium, Petrimonas, Succinovibro), protists (Buxtonella, Enteromonas) and archaea (Methanosphaera and Methanomassiliicoccus). Larval grazing also altered the abundance of several bacterial genera (Pseudomonas, Bacteroides, Flavobacterium, Taibaiella, Sphingopyxis, Sphingobacterium), protists (Oxytricha, Cercomonas, Colpodella, Parabodo) and archaea (Methanobrevibacter and Methanocorpusculum). Overall, larval grazing significantly reduced bacterial and archaeal diversities but increased protist diversity. Moreover, total carbon (TC) and nitrogen (TN) decreased in larval grazed manure, and both TC and TN were highly correlated with several of bacterial, archaeal and protist communities.ConclusionsHouse fly larval grazing altered the abundance and diversity of bacterial, archaeal and protist communities differently than manure aging alone. Fly larvae likely alter community composition by directly feeding on and eliminating microbes and by competing with predatory microbes for available nutrients and microbial prey. Our results lend insight into the role house fly larvae play in shaping manure microbial communities and help identify microbes that house fly larvae utilize as food sources in manure. Information extrapolated from this study can be used to develop manure management strategies to interfere with house fly development and reduce house fly populations.

Highlights

  • House fly larvae (Musca domestica L.) require a live microbial community to successfully develop

  • Archaeal community profiles Archaeal communities comprised a total of 19 operational taxonomic units (OTUs)

  • While larval grazing directly affects microbial communities and their diversity, our study revealed that changes to total carbon (TC), Total Nitrogen (TN) and Total Carbon to Total Nitrogen Ratio (CN) significantly correlated to changes in bacterial, archaeal and protist communities and their compositions and diversities

Read more

Summary

Introduction

House fly larvae (Musca domestica L.) require a live microbial community to successfully develop. Several species of muscid flies feed and breed in decaying organic matter as their adults require protein, sugar and water for their survival and reproduction [6, 7] For their successful development, several muscid fly larvae, such as stable fly (Stomoxys calcitrans L.) and house fly (Musca domestica L.), require live microorganisms in their diet [8, 9]. The house fly, a synanthropic muscid fly, completes its life cycle in a wide range of microbe rich habitats including garbage, animal/human feces and decaying organic matter [1, 6, 7] Cattle manure harbors both prokaryotic and eukaryotic microorganisms [3, 4] and serves as an optimal substrate for house fly larval growth and development [1]. While the utilization of these prokaryotic microbes as a nutritional resource for house flies has been well described, information on the use of eukaryotic microbes, such as protists, as food for house fly larvae is extremely lacking

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call