Abstract

The obligations of the EU Biodiversity Strategy 2020 create a need for mapping and assessment of the state of biodiversity, ecosystems and their services in all European member states. Europe’s nine Outermost Regions (ORs) and 25 Overseas Countries and Territories (OCTs) are mainly islands, scattered around the globe. These territories contain unique flora and fauna and encompass diverse ecosystems, from coral reefs to rainforests. These highly diverse ecosystems provide multiple relevant ecosystem services from local to global scale. To date, the ecosystem services concept has so far received little attention in European ORs and OCTs. Therefore, our aims were (1) to analyse the current state of ecosystem services mapping and assessment in Europe’s overseas territories, (2) to identify knowledge gaps in the context of ecosystem service research and application and (3) to provide recommendations for future research and policy directions to fill these gaps. We conducted a systematic review of scientific literature for each of the ORs and OCTs, screening 1030 publications. The analysis resulted in 161 publications referring to ES mapping and assessment, of which most were conducted in the European Caribbean (31%) and Pacific (21%) territories. Results show that many ORs and OCTs are still blank spots in terms of ecosystem service mapping and assessment and that, despite many biodiversity studies referring to species’ abundance, little has been published on ecosystem services. Our systematic review highlights theknowledge lacking on dealing with invasive species, which pose major threats to native island biodiversity, ecosystem functions and ecosystem services. Further, it discusses knowledge gaps in (1) translation of information on island biodiversity and ecosystem functions into ES; (2) geographical coverage of mapping studies in most ORs and OCTs; (3) the lack of standardised approaches and integrated assessments to map, assess and value ecosystem services. Based on these results, future research and policy priorities could be adapted in order to focus on filling these gaps. To overcome current environmental policy challenges, it is crucial to address the ongoing decline in biodiversity, rising climatic and anthropogenic pressures on ecosystems and to maintain a sustainable ES flow to safeguard human well-being. Ultimately, ES mapping and assessment efforts will form the knowledge base for well-informed decision-making to protect Europe’s vulnerable overseas areas.

Highlights

  • Mapping and Assessment of Ecosystems and their Services (MAES) have received growing attention within the European scientific, policy and practitioner communities to safeguard biodiversity and sustain land use management (Maes et al 2013, Maes et al 2016)

  • We present a thorough literature analysis of published peer-reviewed scientific literature on the topic of MAES in EU Overseas to: 1. review past and current ecosystem services (ES) mapping and assessment efforts, 2. identify knowledge gaps in the context of ES research and application, including the role of invasive species on ES and 3. to provide recommendations to future research and policy directions to fill these gaps to contribute to ES mapping and assessment efforts in Outermost Regions (ORs) and Overseas Countries and Territories (OCTs) and to reach EU-wide as well as global biodiversity targets

  • The results show that the number of ES mapping and assessment publications in European OR and OCTs has been constantly increasing

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Mapping and Assessment of Ecosystems and their Services (MAES) have received growing attention within the European scientific, policy and practitioner communities to safeguard biodiversity and sustain land use management (Maes et al 2013, Maes et al 2016). In line with the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (Millennium Ecosystem Assessment 2005), MAES aims to provide a critical evaluation of information available to guide decision-making on natural resources management and achieve no net loss of species and biodiversity on EU territories. Such assessments of ecosystems and their services can address a broad range of policyrelevant questions, for example on key drivers causing change to ecosystems and ecosystem services (ES) or how to address degradation of ecosystems and biodiversity loss (Maes et al 2013, Bouwma et al 2018).

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call