Abstract

The massive and irrational use of antibiotics in livestock productions has fostered the occurrence and spread of resistance to “old class antimicrobials.” To cope with that phenomenon, some regulations have been already enforced in the member states of the European Union. However, a role of livestock animals in the relatively recent alerts on the rapid worldwide increase of resistance to last-choice antimicrobials as carbapenems is very unlikely. Conversely, these antimicrobials are increasingly administered in veterinary hospitals whose role in spreading bacteria or mobile genetic elements has not adequately been addressed so far. A cross-sectional study was carried out on 105 hospitalized and 100 non-hospitalized pets with the aim of measuring the prevalence of carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (GNB) colonizing dogs and cats, either hospitalized or not hospitalized and estimating the relative odds. Stool samples were inoculated on MacConkey agar plates containing 1 mg/L imipenem which were then incubated aerobically at 37°C ± 1 for 48 h. Isolated bacteria were identified first by Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry and were confirmed by 16S rRNA sequencing. The genetic basis of resistance was investigated using PCR methods, gene or whole genome sequencing (WGS). The prevalence of pets harboring carbapenem-resistant bacteria was 11.4 and 1.0% in hospitalized and not-hospitalized animals, respectively, with an odds ratio of 12.8 (p < 0.01). One pet carried two diverse isolates. Overall, 14 gram-negative non-fermenting bacteria, specifically, one Acinetobacter radioresistens, five Acinetobacter baumannii, six Pseudomonas aeruginosa and two Stenotrophomonas maltophilia were isolated. The Acinetobacter species carried acquired carbapenemases genes encoded by blaNDM-1 and blaOXA-23. In contrast, Pseudomonas phenotypic resistance was associated with the presence of mutations in the oprD gene. Notably, inherent carbapenem-resistant isolates of S. maltophilia were also resistant to the first-line recommended chemotherapeutic trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole. This study estimates the risk of colonization by carbapenem-resistant non-fermenting GNB in pets hospitalized in veterinary tertiary care centers and highlights their potential role in spreading resistance genes among the animal and human community. Public health authorities should consider extending surveillance systems and putting the release of critical antibiotics under more strict control in order to manage the infection/colonization of pets in veterinary settings.

Highlights

  • MATERIALS AND METHODSAmong the large quantities of antimicrobials given to animals each year, only a fractional amount is reserved to pets (Guardabassi et al, 2004; European Medicines Agency, 2015)

  • For Whole Genome Sequencing (WGS), genomic DNA was extracted from overnight broth culture in Brain Heart Infusion (Oxoid, Basingstoke, United Kingdom) using the MagAttract HMW DNA kit (Qiagen, Milan, Italy)

  • This study findings focuses on Acinetobacter spp. as the main emerging threat to public health associated with the hospitalization in veterinary tertiary care facilities (VTCF)

Read more

Summary

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Among the large quantities of antimicrobials given to animals each year, only a fractional amount is reserved to pets (Guardabassi et al, 2004; European Medicines Agency, 2015) The latter estimate is expected to be undervalued since injectable molecules and human specialties are not adequately taken into account (European Medicines Agency, 2015). Veterinary hospitals share some risk factors with human hospitals, such as the use of antibiotics, complex treatments, prolonged hospitalization of critically ill or immunocompromised patients, and the presence of intensive care units These factors favor nosocomial infections, and the exchange of antimicrobial-resistant bacteria and genetic determinants of resistance (Poirel et al, 2008). The raw sequence data of Acinetobacter radioresistens and of five Acinetobacter baumannii isolates were deposited in the GenBank database under BioProject accession PRJNA344732 and PRJNA437120, respectively

RESULTS
A IMI Pseudomonas aeruginosa
DISCUSSION
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call