Abstract

Background and purpose — Understanding the key drivers of hospital variation in postoperative infections after hip fracture surgery is important for directing quality improvements. Therefore, we investigated variation in the risk of any infection, and subgroups of infections including pneumonia and sepsis after hip fracture surgery. Methods — In this nationwide population-based cohort study, all Danish patients aged ≥ 65 undergoing surgery for an incident hip fracture from 2012 to 2017 were included. Risk of postoperative infections, based on data from hospital registration (hospital-treated infections) and antibiotic dispensing (community-treated infections), were calculated using multilevel Poisson regression analysis. Hospital variation was evaluated by intra-class coefficient (ICC) and median risk ratio (MRR). Results — The risk of hospital-treated infection was 15%. The risk of community-treated infection was 24%. The adjusted risk varied between hospitals from 7.8–25% for hospital-treated infection and 16–34% for community-treated infection. The ICC indicated that 19% of the adjusted variance was due to hospital level for hospital-treated infection. The ICC for community-treated infections was 13%. The MRR showed a 2-fold increased risk for the average patient acquiring a hospital-treated infection at the highest risk hospital compared with the lowest risk hospital. For community-treated infection, the MRR was 1.4. Interpretation — Our results suggest that 20% of infections could be reduced by applying the top performing hospitals’ approach. Nearly a 5th of the variation was at the hospital level. This suggests a more standardized approach to avoid postoperative infection after hip fracture surgery. Hip fracture is a leading cause of hospital admission among the elderly. The 30-day mortality following hip fracture surgery has been approximately 10% during the last few years in Denmark (Pedersen et al. 2017). Higher mortality after hip fracture has been associated with a range of hospital factors (Kristensen et al. 2016, Sheehan et al. 2016) and patient factors in observational studies (Roche et al. 2005). Furthermore, variation in 30-day mortality after hip fracture surgery has been observed between Danish hospitals, but not fully explained (Kristensen et al. 2019).

Highlights

  • Hospital variation in the risk of infection after hip fracture surgery: a population-based cohort study including 29,598 patients from 2012–2017

  • Our study is the first to examine the variation between hospitals in the risk of hospital-treated and community-treated infections following hip fracture surgery, and to quantify the hospital-level contribution to the variation using a nationwide population-based cohort design

  • We found a more than 3-fold difference in hospital-treated infections between hospitals, where 19% of the variation was attributed to hospital level

Read more

Summary

Acta Orthopaedica

Hospital variation in the risk of infection after hip fracture surgery: a population-based cohort study including 29,598 patients from 2012–2017. Jeppe Damgren Vesterager , Pia Kjaer Kristensen , Irene Petersen & Alma Becic Pedersen. View supplementary material Submit your article to this journal View related articles

View Crossmark data
Methods
Data sources
Sensitivity analysis
Results
MRR b
Køge Farsø Aalborg Holbæk
Discussion
Strength and limitations
Comparison with previous literature
Findings
Clinical implications

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.