Abstract

There is growing interest in implementing hospital-based health technology assessment (HB-HTA) as a tool to facilitate decision making based on a systematic and multidisciplinary assessment of evidence. However, the decision-making process, including the informational needs of hospital decision makers, is not well described. The objective was to review empirical studies analysing the information that hospital decision makers need when deciding about health technology (HT) investments. A systematic review of empirical studies published in English or Danish from 2000 to 2012 was carried out. The literature was assessed by two reviewers working independently. The identified informational needs were assessed with regard to their agreement with the nine domains of EUnetHTA's Core Model. A total of 2,689 articles were identified and assessed. The review process resulted in 14 relevant studies containing 74 types of information that hospital decision makers found relevant. In addition to information covered by the Core Model, other types of information dealing with political and strategic aspects were identified. The most frequently mentioned types of information in the literature related to clinical, economic and political/strategic aspects. Legal, social, and ethical aspects were seldom considered most important. Hospital decision makers are able to describe their information needs when deciding on HT investments. The different types of information were not of equal importance to hospital decision makers, however, and full agreement between EUnetHTA's Core Model and the hospital decision-makers' informational needs was not observed. They also need information on political and strategic aspects not covered by the Core Model.

Highlights

  • ObjectivesThere is growing interest in implementing hospital-based health technology assessment (HB-HTA) as a tool to facilitate decision making based on a systematic and multidisciplinary assessment of evidence

  • Reasons for exclusion were that (i) the aim of the study was not to identify informational needs of decision makers, (ii) the study did not deal with decision making by hospital or clinical managers, (iii) the study did not take place in a hospital setting, (iv) the article was not based on an empirical study or was based on an empirical study of low quality, (v) the article was not in English or Danish, or (vi) the article was not retrievable (n = 2)

  • The results of this systematic review suggest that hospital decision makers are able to describe their informational needs when deciding on health technologies (HT) investments

Read more

Summary

Objectives

There is growing interest in implementing hospital-based health technology assessment (HB-HTA) as a tool to facilitate decision making based on a systematic and multidisciplinary assessment of evidence. The objective was to review empirical studies analysing the information that hospital decision makers need when deciding about health technology (HT) investments. The review process resulted in 14 relevant studies containing 74 types of information that hospital decision makers found relevant. In addition to information covered by the Core Model, other types of information dealing with political and strategic aspects were identified. The different types of information were not of equal importance to hospital decision makers, and full agreement between EUnetHTA’s Core Model and the hospital decision-makers’ informational needs was not observed. They need information on political and strategic aspects not covered by the Core Model

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call