Abstract
The aim of this article is to reflect on the ideas and proposals for constitutional reform in Argentina during the 1930 crisis and the fall of the first government of Juan Domingo Peron, as devised by three professors at the Faculty of Law and Social Sciences of the University of Buenos Aires. By studying several of their works, lectures, and manuals on constitutional law in a comparative key, the article aims to analyze the ideas that three eminent jurists and university teachers (Carlos Ibarguren, Juan Gonzalez Calderon, and Carlos Sanchez Viamonte) had on reforming the Argentine Constitution in this tense national and global context. Nuanced in themselves and representing three projects distinct in ideological terms, these scholars agree on the need to aggiornar the Magna Carta to reflect the new era to have dawned on the country and the world. Although each of them formulated different theories (Ibarguren argued for a corporatist model; Gonzalez Calderon for a liberal model; and Sanchez Viamonte for a “social” model), they agreed on the need to adapt the terms of the Constitution to the new trends on social and economic rights sweeping the world at the time.
Highlights
Horizontes para a Constituição Nacional: reforma constitucional segundo três professores da Faculdade de Direito e Ciências Sociais da Universidade de Buenos Aires (Argentina, 1930-1950) Resumo O objeto deste artigo consiste em proceder a uma reflexão acerca de algumas ideias e propostas de reforma constitucional na Argentina entre a crise de 1930 e a queda do primeiro governo de Juan Domingo Perón, formuladas por três professores da Faculdade de Direito e Ciências Sociais da Universidade de Buenos Aires
Horizons for the national Constitution: Constitutional reform among three professors at the University of Buenos Aires Faculty of Law and Social Sciences (Argentina, 1930-1950) Abstract The aim of this article is to reflect on the ideas and proposals for constitutional reform in Argentina during the 1930 crisis and the fall of the first government of Juan Domingo Perón, as devised by three professors at the Faculty of Law and Social Sciences of the University of Buenos Aires
Each of them formulated different theories (Ibarguren argued for a corporatist model; González Calderón for a liberal model; and Sánchez Viamonte for a “social” model), they agreed on the need to adapt the terms of the Constitution to the new trends on social and economic rights sweeping the world at the time
Summary
Horizontes para a Constituição Nacional: reforma constitucional segundo três professores da Faculdade de Direito e Ciências Sociais da Universidade de Buenos Aires (Argentina, 1930-1950) Resumo O objeto deste artigo consiste em proceder a uma reflexão acerca de algumas ideias e propostas de reforma constitucional na Argentina entre a crise de 1930 e a queda do primeiro governo de Juan Domingo Perón, formuladas por três professores da Faculdade de Direito e Ciências Sociais da Universidade de Buenos Aires.
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Passagens: Revista Internacional de História Política e Cultura Jurídica
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
