Abstract

Theories of inter-jurisdictional tax and yardstick competition assume that the tax decisions of one jurisdiction will influence the tax decisions of other jurisdictions. This paper empirically addresses the issue of horizontal dependence in local personal income tax rates across jurisdictions. Based on a large data set covering Swedish municipalities over a period of 14 years, we test for interactions across municipalities that share a common border, across municipalities within a distance of 100 km of each other, and across municipalities with similar political representation in the local council. We also test the hypothesis that the tax rate of relatively larger municipalities has a greater influence on their neighbors' tax rate compared to the influence of their smaller neighbors. Our results suggest that when lagged tax rates are controlled for, the horizontal correlation across municipalities that share a common border or are within a distance of 100 km from each other becomes insignificant. This result is of importance as it suggests that lagged tax rates should be included or at least tested for when testing for horizontal interactions or mimicking in local tax rates. However, our results support the hypothesis of horizontal interactions across municipalities that share a common border when the influence of neighboring municipalities is also weighted by their relative population size, i.e. relatively larger neighbors tend to have a greater impact on their neighbor's tax rates than their relatively smaller neighbors. This is of importance as it suggests that distance or proximity matters, although only in combination with the relative population size. We also find some evidence of horizontal dependence across municipalities with similar political preferences.

Highlights

  • The aim of this paper is to empirically test the hypothesis of horizontal interactions or mimicking in local personal income taxes

  • Turning to column 5 in which the influence on i is based on the relative size of the neighboring municipalities and that they share a common border with i.The results indicate a positive correlation, suggesting that the relative size of each neighbor matters where larger neighbors have a larger influence on its neighbors

  • We test for interactions across municipalities who share a common border, across municipalities within a distance of 100 km, and across municipalities with similar political representation in the local council

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The aim of this paper is to empirically test the hypothesis of horizontal interactions or mimicking in local personal income taxes. In theories of tax competition, which builds on Tiebout (1956) and Mirrlees (1971), local jurisdictions compete for a mobile tax base, in this case, individuals and their incomes, using a (low) tax rate as their primary tool. The likelihood of re-election depends on the relative tax rate in neighboring jurisdictions. The likelihood of re-election depends on the income tax rates in neighboring jurisdictions. Even though there are private alternatives, the local government has primary responsibility for these services These services are mainly financed through a proportional income tax (66.1% of total revenues including grants in 2016), a tax which local and regional governments are at liberty to set as they choose, intergovernmental grants (21.3%), and fees (5.2%)..

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call