Abstract
The relation between identity and difference is a much discussed issue in continental philosophy. Within the phenomenological tradition several approaches to this relation stand over and against each other, among them hermeneutics and philosophies of difference. This article sketches their confrontation by choosing two representatives, Gadamer and Levinas, and by focussing on one term that is used by both of them, namely the metaphor of the horizon. For Gadamer the horizon is an open border of a perspective that always includes other perspectives; for Levinas the horizon is an enclosure that is broken through by the Other. Both views have their strong and weak points. Finally, a third approach, the asubjective phenomenology of Jan Patocka, is suggested as a position that combines the strong and convincing ideas of both sides, while avoiding their problems.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
