Abstract

Insertion sequence elements (IS elements) are proposed to play major roles in shaping the genetic and phenotypic landscapes of prokaryotic cells. Recent evidence has raised the possibility that environmental stress conditions increase IS hopping into new sites, and often such hopping has the phenotypic effect of relieving the stress. Although stress-induced targeted mutations have been reported for a number of E. coli genes, the glpFK (glycerol utilization) and the cryptic bglGFB (β-glucoside utilization) systems are among the best characterized where the effects of IS insertion-mediated gene activation are well-characterized at the molecular level. In the glpFK system, starvation of cells incapable of utilizing glycerol leads to an IS5 insertion event that activates the glpFK operon, and enables glycerol utilization. In the case of the cryptic bglGFB operon, insertion of IS5 (and other IS elements) into a specific region in the bglG upstream sequence has the effect of activating the operon in both growing cells, and in starving cells. However, a major unanswered question in the glpFK system, the bgl system, as well as other examples, has been why the insertion events are promoted at specific locations, and how the specific stress condition (glycerol starvation for example) can be mechanistically linked to enhanced insertion at a specific locus. In this paper, we show that a specific DNA structural feature (superhelical stress-induced duplex destabilization, SIDD) is associated with “stress-induced” IS5 insertion in the glpFK, bglGFB, flhDC, fucAO and nfsB systems. We propose a speculative mechanistic model that links specific environmental conditions to the unmasking of an insertional hotspot in the glpFK system. We demonstrate that experimentally altering the predicted stability of a SIDD element in the nfsB gene significantly impacts IS5 insertion at its hotspot.

Highlights

  • In this communication we focus on five systems in which IS5 insertion leads to gene activation or inactivation

  • In actively dividing E. coli cells, negative supercoiling is maintained in the range of around σ = -0.06 (σ is the specific linking difference, or DNA structural features that favor IS5 insertion superhelical density; [34, 35]), with σ ranging under different conditions, from -0.03 to -0.09

  • The occurrence of the glpFK-activating IS5 insertion within a Stress-induced DNA duplex destabilization (SIDD) sequence offers an opportunity to address two questions: (1) How can one possibly link an environmental stress condition to IS5 hopping into a specific locus, and (2) What exactly is the role of low G(x) values on target selection for IS5 insertion?

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In actively dividing E. coli cells, negative supercoiling is maintained in the range of around σ = -0.06 (σ is the specific linking difference, or DNA structural features that favor IS5 insertion superhelical density; [34, 35]), with σ ranging under different conditions, from -0.03 to -0.09.

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.