Hoop Housing for Feeder Pigs Offers a Welfare-Friendly Environment Compared to a Nonbedded Confinement System

Abstract

Total confinement systems of swine production offer several benefits and costs in terms of animal welfare. Swine raised in total confinement are protected from environmental extremes and predators; however, welfare concerns stem from observations of stereotypic behavior and lameness of pigs, common in some of these systems. Because total confinement systems are expensive to build and maintain compared to less intensive systems, producers have become interested in an inexpensive alternative: hoop structures (Hoop). Open-ended Quonsets shaped like a half cylinder lying on its flat side, the Hoop use bedding to keep the pigs dry and allow this bedding to compost beneath the pigs to keep them warm in winter. This project compared the behavior and physiology of pigs in a nonbedded confinement system (NBCS) with those in the Hoop. Two experiments, 1 in the winter and 1 in the summer, assessed the welfare of pigs based on the incidence of aberrant behavior, physiologic response to handling, incidence of lameness, and the performance of play behavior. Pigs raised in the NBCS performed more aberrant behaviors and less play behavior, had greater plasma cortisol in response to handling (but fewer vocalizations), and a greater incidence of injuries than did the pigs raised in the Hoop. Based on these data, pigs in the Hoop were adjudged to have enhanced welfare as compared to pigs raised in the NBCS. Because the welfare of pigs in the Hoop appears to be greater than the welfare of pigs raised in the NBCS, future research should determine which factors are most important to pigs and then try to incorporate these into production systems.