Abstract

Since 2013, Hong Kong scholars have been considering that it is open for courts of Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of People's Republic of China to recognise a right to marry for same-sex couples. The judicial recognition of entitlement of a party to a same-sex marriage celebrated outside Hong Kong as spouse for purpose of an immigration policy, civil service benefits and tax legislation by Hong Kong Court of Final Appeal in two cases 2018 and 2019 has raised prospects of judicial recognition of same-sex marriage for Hong Kong couples. This paper examines recent direct legal challenges against Hong Kong's marriage legislation's restriction of marriage to the civil equivalent of a Christian marriage between a man and a woman and consequential absence of a form of legal recognition of a same-sex relationship on par with marriage in light of differing considerations on part of Hong Kong's senior judges of appropriate approach to resolve such a challenge. Particularly, it critiques lex specialist approach adopted by Court of First Instance in its judgment dismissing first of these legal challenges by holding that since both Basic Law of Hong Kong Special Administrative Region and Hong Kong Bill of Rights Ordinance (Cap.484), instruments setting out scheme of protection of human rights in Hong Kong, protect right to marry of Hong Kong residents in particularly (and narrowly), other substantive protection, say, by invoking principle of equality before law and non-discrimination also enshrined in those instruments, was thereby precluded.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.