Abstract

Molecular variants of the angiotensinogen (AGT) and the angiotensin II type 1 receptor (ATR) genes have been associated with the risk of coronary artery disease (CAD) and myocardial infarction (MI), but data so far available are conflicting. The primary object of the paper is to verify this possible association by a rigorous, angiographically controlled study in a large sample of patients with or without multi-vessel CAD. We designed a large case-control study in Italian patients candidates for coronary artery bypass grafting, with angiographically documented multi-vessel CAD, compared to subjects with angiographically documented normal coronary arteries. AGT M235T and ATR A1166C gene polymorphisms were analysed in 699 subjects; 454 patients were candidates for coronary artery bypass grafting, having angiographically documented (mainly multi-vessel) CAD. An appropriate documentation of previous MI was obtained from 404/454 (89%, 247 with and 157 without MI). Subjects (n = 245) with angiographically documented normal coronary arteries, were included as control group (CAD-free group). CAD patients had a substantial burden of conventional risk factors as compared with controls free of coronary atherosclerosis. Age, gender, smoking habit and number of stenosed vessels were the only differences between patients with or without previous myocardial infarction, who were similarly exposed to the other conventional risk factors (including hypertension). AGT M235T and ATR A1166C allele and genotype frequencies were similar between CAD and CAD-free patients. In the CAD group, AGT 235T allele was found more frequently in subjects with a previous myocardial infarction (0.494 versus 0.414; P < or = 0.05). By logistic regression, homozygosity for AGT 235T variant appeared to confer 1.9-fold increased risk for MI in both the univariate and the multivariate (adjusted for age, gender, smoking habit and number of stenosed vessels) model. AGT 235 T homozygous patients with multivessel CAD have an increased risk of myocardial infarction as compared with subjects with clinically similar phenotype but different genotype.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.