Abstract

Homogeneous nucleation of water is investigated in argon and in nitrogen at about 240 K and 0.1 MPa, 1 MPa, and 2 MPa by means of a pulse expansion wave tube. The surface tension reduction at high pressure qualitatively explains the observed enhancement of the nucleation rate of water in argon as well as in nitrogen. The differences in nucleation rates for the two mixtures at high pressure are consistent with the differences in adsorption behavior of the different carrier gas molecules. At low pressure, there is not enough carrier gas available to ensure the growing clusters are adequately thermalized by collisions with carrier gas molecules so that the nucleation rate is lower than under isothermal conditions. This reduction depends on the carrier gas, pressure, and temperature. A qualitative agreement between experiments and theory is found for argon and nitrogen as carrier gases. As expected, the reduction in the nucleation rates is more pronounced at higher temperatures. For helium as the carrier gas, non-isothermal effects appear to be substantially stronger than predicted by theory. The critical cluster sizes are determined experimentally and theoretically according to the Gibbs-Thomson equation, showing a reasonable agreement as documented in the literature. Finally, we propose an empirical correction of the classical nucleation theory for the nucleation rate calculation. The empirical expression is in agreement with the experimental data for the analyzed mixtures (water-helium, water-argon, and water-nitrogen) and thermodynamic conditions (0.06 MPa-2 MPa and 220 K-260 K).

Highlights

  • Numerous studies have been reported on the dropwise vapor to liquid phase transition since the pioneering work of Wilson in 1879.1 An extensive overview of the past 100+ years of experimental and theoretical developments in condensation study has been published by Wyslouzil and Wölk (2016).2 One of the puzzling aspects is the effect of the carrier gas and pressure on nucleation.3–7 A successful facility to study homogeneous nucleation is the Pulse Expansion Wave Tube (PEWT)

  • Considering these experimental evidences, we can conclude that the adsorption phenomena and the corresponding water surface tension reduction seem to be the predominant causes of the nucleation rate increase at high pressure conditions

  • Homogeneous nucleation of water has been experimentally studied in argon and nitrogen at about 240 K with the PEWT facility

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Numerous studies have been reported on the dropwise vapor to liquid phase transition since the pioneering work of Wilson in 1879.1 An extensive overview of the past 100+ years of experimental and theoretical developments in condensation study has been published by Wyslouzil and Wölk (2016). One of the puzzling aspects is the effect of the carrier gas and pressure on nucleation. A successful facility to study homogeneous nucleation is the Pulse Expansion Wave Tube (PEWT). One of the puzzling aspects is the effect of the carrier gas and pressure on nucleation.. We present new data on homogeneous nucleation of water at 0.1 MPa, 1 MPa, and 2 MPa in two different carrier gases: nitrogen at 240 K and argon at 236 K and 240 K. We shall discuss several aspects of the role of the carrier gas in the nucleation process. It reduces warming of the growing clusters and causes the nucleation process to be isothermal at sufficiently high pressure. An empirical correction of theoretical (CNT) nucleation rate is proposed, which takes into account the influence of the different carrier gases and the effect of the investigated pressure and temperature conditions

THEORETICAL BACKGROUND
Classical nucleation theory and nucleation theorem
Pressure and carrier gas influence on the surface tension
Kinetic model for non-isothermal nucleation
Enhancement factor and supersaturation definition
EXPERIMENTAL
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Critical cluster size
Empirical correlation for the water nucleation rate
Effect of carrier gas adsorption on J exp at high pressure
Thermalization effect on J exp at low pressure
CONCLUSIONS
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call