Abstract
The impact of a target‐hardening initiative on residents of an inner city area of Plymouth, England, was assessed by comparing the perceptions of those included in the initiative (experimental group) with other local residents (control group). While the former felt that target hardening had improved their sense of security, differences between the two groups were minimal on standard ‘fear of crime’ questions, leading us to question whether this was because the project failed or due to the evaluation design. One aspect of the latter is whether ‘fear of crime’ questions are valid measurements in this context. Another relates to differences between the experimental and control groups. A further valuable lesson from the research in this respect was that even where initiatives locate impoverished groups, they may still miss other, even more disadvantaged sections of the community living in the same area.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
