Abstract

Positive-pressure ventilators are equipped with low-inspiratory-pressure alarms to protect patients from hypoventilation. Small uncuffed tracheostomy tubes have a high resistance, and may not trigger these alarms during decannulation. To determine whether ventilator low-inspiratory-pressure alarms are effective in detecting tracheostomy decannulation. We connected tracheostomy tubes of varying inner diameters (3.0 to 6.0 mm) to a home ventilator and simulated decannulation using low (tidal volume [VT], 600 mL; peak inspiratory pressure [PIP], 25 cm H(2)O), medium (VT, 800 mL; PIP, 30 cm H(2)O), and high (VT, 1,000 mL; PIP, 35 cm H(2)O) ventilator settings. When the ventilator low-inspiratory-pressure alarm was set at 4 cm H(2)O below the desired PIP, it failed to alarm for simulated decannulation of tracheostomy tubes < 4.5 mm on low and medium settings, and < 4.0 mm on high settings. When the ventilator low-inspiratory-pressure alarm was set at 10 cm H(2)O below the desired PIP, it failed to alarm with tracheostomy tubes < 6.0 mm. We conclude that ventilator low-inspiratory-pressure alarms fail to alarm during simulated decannulation with small tracheostomy tubes commonly used in children. We speculate that low-inspiratory-pressure alarms set at 4 cm H(2)O below the desired PIP will detect more decannulation than when set at 10 cm H(2)O below the desired PIP.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.