Abstract
Age studies, particularly within the United States, is academically “homeless.” You cannot get a degree in age studies; you will not find departments of age or aging studies with strong humanities representation; and you will not find job listings seeking experts in age studies. This essay explores some of the consequences that follow from age studies not having an academic “home,” as well as the gains and constraints that age studies scholars may encounter when pursuing age studies work within a different discipline or field, using the particular example of working within health humanities. While the essay ultimately presents ambivalence about the necessity, and pessimism about the practicality, of an academic home for age studies, it does lay out several priorities for future field growth. In particular, the priority that should guide field-building in age studies is enabling future students to pursue work in age studies.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: Age, Culture, Humanities: An Interdisciplinary Journal
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.