Abstract

Penal substitution emerged out of two streams in Lutheran and Reformed theology: doctrines of extrinsic divine action in forensic justification and predestination, and a discourse of punishment underlying the persecution of heretics and discipline of believers. Behind both lies the specter of divine hiddenness and wrath. Lax morals and widespread dissent drove Luther and Melanchthon to call for persecution of Anabaptists and for the cura religionis, the state oversight of the church. In the Reformed tradition, the disciplinary experiments of Martin Bucer influenced John Calvin to develop the consistory, a comprehensive program of pastoral surveillance. Extrinsicism in doctrines of justification and predestination led to subjective emphases in spirituality to show evidence of one’s salvation. Christ dies on the cross as a substitutionary punishment of divine wrath, but the Puritans also develop affective exercises of undergoing divine wrath for sin in the believer. The more Christ is punished for human sin, the more believers take that punishment into their own interiority.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.