Abstract
ABSTRACT The holistic paradigm has been identified as the preferred method for the development of KM frameworks. Under this premise, this research aims to analyse the adherence of the Castillo and Cazarini framework to holistic KM and to discern if its structure considers all the dimensions related to this form of management. Qualitative Content Analysis was employed to examine the framework and quantification was used to expose the percentage of this structure’s adherence to holistic KM. As a result, the Castillo and Cazarini framework partially adheres to holistic KM. This result allows inferring that there is an opportunity for the development of new frameworks that consider all the dimensions presented in this research. Additionally, the boundaries between KM and other forms of management require a greater and more in-depth theoretical analysis to discern what constitutes knowledge management more explicitly.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
