Abstract

Urban water and wastewater utilities are striving to improve their environmental and economic performances due to multiple challenges such as increasingly stringent quality criterion, aging infrastructure, constraining financial burden, growing urban population, climate challenges and dwindling resources. Growing needs of holistic assessments of urban water systems are required to identify systems-level cross-domain solutions. This study evaluated the life cycle environmental and economic impacts of urban water and wastewater systems with two utilities in Greater Cincinnati region as a case study. The scope of this study includes the entire urban water and wastewater systems starting from raw water acquisition for drinking water to wastewater treatment and discharge. The detailed process-based life cycle models were developed based on the datasets provided by local water and wastewater utilities. The life cycle assessment indicated that the operation and maintenance of drinking water distribution was a dominating contributor for energy consumption (43%) and global warming potential (41%). Wastewater discharge from the wastewater treatment plant contributed to more than 80% of the total eutrophication potential. The cost analysis determined that labor and maintenance cost (19%) for wastewater collection, and electricity cost (13%) for drinking water distribution were major contributors. Electricity purchased by the utility was the driver for the majority of impact categories assessed with the exception of eutrophication, blue water use, and metal depletion. Infrastructure requirements had a negligible influence on impact results, contributing less than 3% to most categories, with the exception of metal depletion where it led to 68% of total burdens. Sensitivity analysis showed that the life cycle environmental results were more sensitive to the choice of the electricity mixes and electricity consumption than the rest of input parameters such as chemical dosages, and infrastructure life time. This is one of the first comprehensive studies of the whole urban water system using real case data. It elucidates a bigger picture of energy, resource and cost distributions in a typical urban centralized water system. Inherent to a modern city as large population centers, a significant expenditure has to be invested to provide water services function (moving water, treating water/wastewater) in order to avoid human and environmental health problems. This study provides insights for optimization potentials of overall treatment efficiency and can serve as a benchmark for communities considering adoption of alternative water systems.

Highlights

  • Goal and scope This study aims to understand 1) the detailed process-based life cycle models from real treatment plant data so that the utility managers are able to make targeted decisions; 2) the importance of integration of water and wastewater management and a bigger picture of energy, resource and cost distributions in a typical urban centralized water system; 3) the environmental impacts and costs of an urban water system using the Greater Cincinnati region as a case study, and identify the contributions of the unit processes on their respective impacts

  • The electricity consumption during Drinking water treatment plant (DWTP) in-plant pumping, water distribution and wastewater aeration resulted in 21%, 43%, and 13% of total fossil fuel depletion, respectively

  • The findings on eutrophication are consistent with previous studies (Amores et al, 2013; Buckley et al, 2011; Friedrich et al, 2009; Lassaux et al, 2007; Lundie et al, 2004, Mahgoub et al, 2010), which confirmed that nitrogen and phosphorus releases from the wastewater discharge were the major contributors to the eutrophication impact in other regions

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Most urban water systems in developed countries have been managed to satisfy the urban water and sanitation demands through centralized configurations. With multiple challenges such as increasingly stringent quality criterion, aging infrastructure, constraining financial burden, growing urban population, climate effects and the promotion of sustainable and healthy communities, there is urgent need for systematically evaluating the performance of the current infrastructure and identifying strategies to improve the efficiency and sustainability of urban water system management

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call