Abstract
Barber and Lyon (1996a) and Kothari and Warner (1996) document conventional tests of long-run abnormal returns are misspecified. In this research, we propose alternative methods to test for long-run abnormal returns. Our methods have two key characteristics. First, long-run abnormal returns are calculated using reference portfolios that yield an abnormal return measure with a population mean that is identically zero. Second, our methods control for the documented positive skewness in long-run abnormal returns calculated using reference portfolios. We control for the positive skewness by either (1) adjusting conventional t statistics using well-documented statistical methods, or (2) generating the empirical distribution of mean long-run abnormal returns via simulation. In addition to yielding reasonably well-specified test statistics in a variety of sampling situations, we document that these two methods are more powerful than the control firm approach analyzed by Barber and Lyon.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
