Abstract

BackgroundHIV stigma undermines a person’s wellbeing and quality of life and hinders HIV control efforts. This study examined the extent and drivers of HIV stigma in the teaching hospitals in Sana’a City, Yemen. The country has low HIV prevalence (4000 (2000-11,000) per 100,000) and limited HIV control funds, worsened by a long conflict and an economic crisis.MethodsWe conducted a cross-sectional study of 320 Yemeni health professionals in all the four teaching hospitals in Sana’a City. Data were collected anonymously, using an adapted self-completed Arabic version of the Health Policy Project HIV Stigma tool. The questionnaire covered the respondents’ background, the stigmatising practices, and potential personal and professional drivers of stigma.ResultsThe majority of the participants were: females (68%), 20–39 years old (85%), nurses (84%), and holding a nursing diploma (69%) or a bachelor’s degree (27%). None of the hospitals had institutional policies against HIV stigma, and 93% of the participants believed the current infection control measures were inadequate. Less than half of the participants provided care for people living with HIV (PLHIV) (45%), had received HIV training (33%), and were confident that their HIV knowledge was adequate (23%). The majority indicated a preference to test patients for HIV prior to surgical procedures (77%) and disclose positive HIV results to others (99%) without prior knowledge or consent. All the participants had exhibited a form of HIV-related stigmatization, such as avoiding physical contact with PLHIV (87%) or wearing gloves throughout the consultation (96.5%). These practices were significantly correlated with the fear of infection, high perceived risk of infection, and poor work environment (p < 0.05).ConclusionPLHIV face widespread stigmatizing behaviour in the teaching hospitals in Sana’a City, consistent with the higher level of stigma in low HIV prevalence countries and its links to the fear of infection, poor HIV knowledge, and limited funding for HIV control. Stigma reduction interventions are required at institutional and individual levels. In addition, anti-discrimination policies and structural adjustments are needed, in combination with training on HIV and universal precautions, and action to tackle negative attitudes towards PLHIV and key populations.

Highlights

  • HIV stigma undermines a person’s wellbeing and quality of life and hinders HIV control efforts

  • Identified by Link and Phelan, labelling, stereotyping, separation, status loss, and discrimination as various forms of stigma [2], and are considered a violation of human rights when targeted at people living with HIV (PLHIV) [3,4,5,6]

  • This study focuses on the mechanism of enacted stigma, which refers to the discrimination experienced by PLHIV

Read more

Summary

Introduction

HIV stigma undermines a person’s wellbeing and quality of life and hinders HIV control efforts. Identified by Link and Phelan, labelling, stereotyping, separation, status loss, and discrimination as various forms of stigma [2], and are considered a violation of human rights when targeted at people living with HIV (PLHIV) [3,4,5,6]. PLHIV experience the mechanisms of internalised, anticipated, and enacted HIV stigma [7]. Internalised stigma denotes the endorsement of negative beliefs, views and feelings of oneself, whereas anticipated stigma is awareness of negative social perceptions towards HIV, and the expectation that PLHIV will experience prejudice. Enacted stigma refers to the discrimination experienced by PLHIV [7]. This study focuses on the mechanism of enacted stigma, which refers to the discrimination experienced by PLHIV

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call