Abstract

BackgroundIn the Asia-Pacific region, limited systematic assessment has been conducted on HIV service delivery models. Applying an analytical framework of the continuum of prevention and care, this study aimed to assess HIV service deliveries in six Asia and Pacific countries from the perspective of service availability, linking approaches and performance monitoring for maximizing HIV case detection and retention.MethodsEach country formed a review team that provided published and unpublished information from the national HIV program. Four types of continuum were examined: (i) service linkages between key population outreach and HIV diagnosis (vertical-community continuum); (ii) chronic care provision across HIV diagnosis and treatment (chronological continuum); (iii) linkages between HIV and other health services (horizontal continuum); and (iv) comprehensive care sites coordinating care provision (hub and heart of continuum).ResultsRegarding the vertical-community continuum, all districts had voluntary counselling and testing (VCT) in all countries except for Myanmar and Vietnam. In these two countries, limited VCT availability was a constraint for referring key populations reached. All countries monitored HIV testing coverage among key populations.Concerning the chronological continuum, the proportion of districts/townships having antiretroviral treatment (ART) was less than 70% except in Thailand, posing a barrier for accessing pre-ART/ART care. Mechanisms for providing chronic care and monitoring retention were less developed for VCT/pre-ART process compared to ART process in all countries.On the horizontal continuum, the availability of HIV testing for tuberculosis patients and pregnant women was limited and there were sub-optimal linkages between tuberculosis, antenatal care and HIV services except for Cambodia and Thailand. These two countries indicated higher HIV testing coverage than other countries.Regarding hub and heart of continuum, all countries had comprehensive care sites with different degrees of community involvement.ConclusionsThe analytical framework was useful to identify similarities and considerable variations in service availability and linking approaches across the countries. The study findings would help each country critically adapt and adopt global recommendations on HIV service decentralization, linkages and integration. Especially, the findings would inform cross-fertilization among the countries and national HIV program reviews to determine county-specific measures for maximizing HIV case detection and retention.

Highlights

  • In the Asia-Pacific region, limited systematic assessment has been conducted on HIV service delivery models

  • Background information of the study countries The study countries are Cambodia, Myanmar, Nepal, Papua New Guinea (PNG), Thailand and Vietnam. These countries were chosen based on the population size (5 to 100 millions), area (100,000 to 1,000,000 square kilometer), income level, type of HIV epidemics, and willingness of the national HIV programs, World Health Organization (WHO) country offices, and FHI360 country offices to participate in the study

  • In Vietnam, the number of districts with voluntary counselling and testing (VCT) was much fewer than the number of districts with outreach services for key populations

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In the Asia-Pacific region, limited systematic assessment has been conducted on HIV service delivery models. To reach Zero AIDS-related Deaths, the Treatment 2.0 initiative gives us hope It aims to stimulate innovation and improve the efficiency and impact of HIV prevention, care and treatment programs in resource-limited countries [5,6]. The primary aims of this pillar are; (a) increasing community engagement for HIV testing and counseling, (b) promoting early enrollment in preART care and ART, and (c) retaining them for life. This initiative calls for the expanding evidence base on optimal service delivery models in a variety of settings and in resource-limited contexts

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.