Abstract

ObjectivePI susceptibility results from a complex interplay between protease and Gag proteins, with Gag showing wide variation across HIV-1 subtypes. We explored the impact of pre-treatment susceptibility on the outcome of lopinavir/ritonavir monotherapy.MethodsTreatment-naive individuals who experienced lopinavir/ritonavir monotherapy failure from the MONARK study were matched (by subtype, viral load and baseline CD4 count) with those who achieved virological response (‘successes’). Successes were defined by viral load <400 copies/mL after week 24 and <50 copies/mL from week 48 to week 96. Full-length Gag–protease was amplified from patient samples for in vitro phenotypic susceptibility testing, with susceptibility expressed as fold change (FC) relative to a subtype B reference strain.ResultsBaseline lopinavir susceptibility was lower in viral failures compared with viral successes, but the differences were not statistically significant (median lopinavir susceptibility: 4.4 versus 8.5, respectively, P = 0.17). Among CRF02_AG/G patients, there was a significant difference in lopinavir susceptibility between the two groups (7.1 versus 10.4, P = 0.047), while in subtype B the difference was not significant (2.7 versus 3.4, P = 0.13). Subtype CRF02_AG/G viruses had a median lopinavir FC of 8.7 compared with 3.1 for subtype B (P = 0.001).ConclusionsWe report an association between reduced PI susceptibility (using full-length Gag–protease sequences) at baseline and subsequent virological failure on lopinavir/ritonavir monotherapy in antiretroviral-naive patients harbouring subtype CRF02_AG/G viruses. We speculate that this may be important in the context of suboptimal adherence in determining viral failure.

Highlights

  • Efficacious, long-term HAART treatment entails both a high financial cost and a risk of significant side effects, and exploration of alternative treatment regimens is necessary

  • Boosted PI monotherapy has been studied in a small number of randomized trials, with poorer outcomes compared with standard triple therapy when used as initial therapy in the MONARK study[1,2] or as second-line therapy after an NNRTI first-line failure in resource-limited settings.[3,4]

  • Based on sample availability from MONARK, we studied eight individuals with lopinavir/ritonavir monotherapy failure (Figure S1, available as Supplementary data at JAC Online) and to these we matched eight patients who achieved virological response (‘successes’)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Efficacious, long-term HAART treatment entails both a high financial cost and a risk of significant side effects, and exploration of alternative treatment regimens is necessary. Simplification strategies have been investigated to reduce the number of antiretroviral drugs required as part of treatment regimens without compromising treatment efficacy.

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.