Abstract

Previous studies have demonstrated a stronger seroreactivity against some synthetic peptides responsible for inducing neutralizing antibodies in injecting drug users (IDU) compared to that of individuals sexually infected with HIV-1 (S), but the effectiveness in terms of the neutralizing ability of these antibodies has not been evaluated. Our objective was to study the humoral immune response of IDU by determining the specificity of their antibodies and the presence of neutralizing antibodies. The neutralization capacity against the HIV-1 isolate MN (genotype B), the primary HIV-1 isolate 95BRRJ021 (genotype F), and the seroreactivity with peptides known to induce neutralizing antibodies, from the V2 and V3 loops of different HIV-1 subtypes, were analyzed. Seroreactivity indicates that IDU plasma are more likely to recognize a broader range of peptides than S plasma, with significantly higher titers, especially of V3 peptides. Similar neutralization frequencies of the MN isolate were observed in plasma of the IDU (16/47) and S (20/60) groups in the 1:10 dilution. The neutralization of the 95BRRJ021 isolate was more frequently observed for plasma from the S group (15/23) than from the IDU group (15/47, P = 0.0108). No correlation between neutralization and seroreactivity with the peptides tested was observed. These results suggest that an important factor responsible for the extensive and broad humoral immune response observed in IDU is their infection route. There was very little difference in neutralizing antibody response between the IDU and S groups despite their differences in seroreactivity and health status.

Highlights

  • The use of injection drugs is an important route of HIV-1 transmission, currently representing one of the major modes of infection in North Africa, the Middle East, Asia, Latin America, North America, and Europe [1]

  • According to the HIV/AIDS epidemic report published by UNAIDS after the XIV International AIDS Conference (2002), this transmission mode is especially important in countries like Austria (27.0%), Italy (33.6%), Thailand (39.6%), and Brazil, where, according to more recent data, 20.6% of the AIDS cases were reported to be in injecting drug users (IDU) [2]

  • The IDU and S groups compared in this study presented some important differences: V3Fbr V3F V3E V3D V3C

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The use of injection drugs is an important route of HIV-1 transmission, currently representing one of the major modes of infection in North Africa, the Middle East, Asia, Latin America, North America, and Europe [1]. According to the HIV/AIDS epidemic report published by UNAIDS after the XIV International AIDS Conference (2002), this transmission mode is especially important in countries like Austria (27.0%), Italy (33.6%), Thailand (39.6%), and Brazil, where, according to more recent data, 20.6% of the AIDS cases were reported to be in injecting drug users (IDU) [2]. For IDU the selection should be restricted by the susceptibility of blood mononuclear cells and by the different variants of the HIV-1 that are introduced directly into the blood

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call