Abstract

Hazan and Zeifman were the first to explore Bowlby’s proposition that adults would organize their attachment relationships into a hierarchy and since then considerable research has explored both the structure and function of attachment hierarchies using different methodologies. In this study, previous findings establishing an association between attachment and networks were replicated and the associations between network members were explored. First, consistent with expectations, the findings provided additional evidence that romantic partners do not necessarily jump to the top of the hierarchy and young adults continue to place parents, in particular mothers, at the top of their hierarchy. Consistent with previous work, security was associated with placing others closer to the self and attachment avoidance was associated with placing others farther from the self on an electronic bull’s eye. Furthermore, to date, this is the first study to examine the association between attachment representations and the organization of network members. Interestingly, security was associated with placing network members closer to each other and attachment avoidance was associated with placing network members farther from each other. This finding suggests that individuals with high attachment security may be more motivated to allow members of their social networks to mingle whereas individuals with high attachment avoidance scores seemed to be motivated to keep their network members at a distance. The results of this study extend our understanding how attachment representations may influence the organization of our social networks.

Highlights

  • Hazan and Zeifman were the first to explore Bowlby’s proposition that adults would organize their attachment relationships into a hierarchy and since considerable research has explored both the structure and function of attachment hierarchies using different methodologies

  • There was a positive association between ranking and distance; In other words, network members who were ranked higher on the Attachment Networks Questionnaire (ANQ) were placed closer to “you” on the bull’s eye: mother, r(217) = .20, p = .003; father, r(181) = .31, p < .001; closest sibling r(179) = .33, p < .001; closest friend r(211) = .25, p < .001; romantic partner, r(100) = .52, p

  • Despite the null associations between attachment scales and number of people listed in participants’ networks, attachment security was associated with placing fathers and partners closer to the center “you” on the bull’s eye and attachment avoidance – both fearful and dismissing attachment – was associated with placing mothers, fathers, and partners farther away

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Hazan and Zeifman were the first to explore Bowlby’s proposition that adults would organize their attachment relationships into a hierarchy and since considerable research has explored both the structure and function of attachment hierarchies using different methodologies. There were no differences between the groups on where (i.e., how close) participants placed their mother, father, closest sibling, closest friend, and romantic partner on the electronic bull’s eye.

Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.