Abstract

Flea-borne typhus, due to Rickettsia typhi and R. felis, is an infection causing fever, headache, rash, and diverse organ manifestations that can result in critical illness or death. This is the second part of a two-part series describing the rise, decline, and resurgence of flea-borne typhus (FBT) in the United States over the last century. These studies illustrate the influence of historical events, social conditions, technology, and public health interventions on the prevalence of a vector-borne disease. Flea-borne typhus was an emerging disease, primarily in the Southern USA and California, from 1910 to 1945. The primary reservoirs in this period were the rats Rattus norvegicus and Ra. rattus and the main vector was the Oriental rat flea (Xenopsylla cheopis). The period 1930 to 1945 saw a dramatic rise in the number of reported cases. This was due to conditions favorable to the proliferation of rodents and their fleas during the Depression and World War II years, including: dilapidated, overcrowded housing; poor environmental sanitation; and the difficulty of importing insecticides and rodenticides during wartime. About 42,000 cases were reported between 1931–1946, and the actual number of cases may have been three-fold higher. The number of annual cases of FBT peaked in 1944 at 5401 cases. American involvement in World War II, in the short term, further perpetuated the epidemic of FBT by the increased production of food crops in the American South and by promoting crowded and unsanitary conditions in the Southern cities. However, ultimately, World War II proved to be a powerful catalyst in the control of FBT by improving standards of living and providing the tools for typhus control, such as synthetic insecticides and novel rodenticides. A vigorous program for the control of FBT was conducted by the US Public Health Service from 1945 to 1952, using insecticides, rodenticides, and environmental sanitation and remediation. Government programs and relative economic prosperity in the South also resulted in slum clearance and improved housing, which reduced rodent harborage. By 1956, the number of cases of FBT in the United States had dropped dramatically to only 98. Federally funded projects for rat control continued until the mid-1980s. Effective antibiotics for FBT, such as the tetracyclines, came into clinical practice in the late 1940s. The first diagnostic test for FBT, the Weil-Felix test, was found to have inadequate sensitivity and specificity and was replaced by complement fixation in the 1940s and the indirect fluorescent antibody test in the 1980s. A second organism causing FBT, R. felis, was discovered in 1990. Flea-borne typhus persists in the United States, primarily in South and Central Texas, the Los Angeles area, and Hawaii. In the former two areas, the opossum (Didelphis virginiana) and cats have replaced rats as the primary reservoirs, with the cat flea (Ctenocephalides felis) now as the most important vector. In Hawaii, 73% of cases occur in Maui County because it has lower rainfall than other areas. Despite great successes against FBT in the post-World War II era, it has proved difficult to eliminate because it is now associated with our companion animals, stray pets, opossums, and the cat flea, an abundant and non-selective vector. In the new millennium, cases of FBT are increasing in Texas and California. In 2018–2019, Los Angeles County experienced a resurgence of FBT, with rats as the reservoir.

Highlights

  • Flea-borne typhus (FBT), known as murine typhus, is an infection caused by Rickettsia typhi and R. felis

  • While the presence of R. felis in opossums and cat fleas was widely recognized, this study demonstrated that this pathogen is present in rats and X. cheopis

  • Flea-borne typhus, due to Rickettsia typhi and R. felis, is an infection causing fever, headache, rash, and diverse organ manifestations that can result in critical illness or death

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Flea-borne typhus (FBT), known as murine typhus, is an infection caused by Rickettsia typhi and R. felis. Studies of the epidemiology of FBT in San Antonio and the impact of DDT dusting were conducted by David E. In a preliminary study of rodent infestation, Davis and Pollard divided the city into six zones They found about equal numbers of Ra. rattus and Ra. norvegicus. Human cases of FBT in San Antonio were more common in areas with abundant rats [18]. Before DDT dusting in San Antonio, the average FBT seropositivity rates of Ra. rattus and Ra. norvegicus were 30% and 70%, respectively, and the average flea burdens were. As flea and rodent control was established, instead of wide DDT distribution, pin-point dusting was done in areas with persistent cases, large Oriental rat flea populations, or heavy rat infestations [26].

(Figures
Typhus
A graph showing cases of flea-borne in nine Southern states
The Advent of New Rodenticides and Integrated Rodent Control
Attendees examine a poster presenting
Mapdecreasing showing decreasing cases and geographic of FBT in the United
Two Immunization Campaigns Against Flea-Borne Typhus
Advances in Diagnostic Testing for Flea-Borne Typhus
Bengtson
Nomenclature of Flea-Borne Typhus and Its Etiological Agent
The Treatment of Flea-Borne Typhus
Woodward
Another Organism Causing Flea-Borne Typhus Is Discovered
12. Flea-Borne Typhus in Hawaii
13. Conclusions
Findings
14. Epidemiologic
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call