Abstract

The Helsinki University Library started the microfilming of Finnish newspapers in 1951 on 35 mm safety film which was cellulose acetate based until the last half of the 1980’s. After some preliminary projects a private service bureau called Rekolid both filmed and copied the films. Because of many kinds of problems the filming was given to Helsinki University Photographic Institute, later known as Helsinki University Audio-Visual Centre, where they also had more interest in the theoretical aspects of photography. The Institute had some scientific research activities too. The technical quality of the microfilms rose when the existing standards were introduced and taken seriously, test targets were utilized, the densities were checked with a properly calibrated densitometer, and so on. The next change took place in 1990 when Helsinki University established the Centre for Microfilming and Conservation in Mikkeli some 230 kilometres northeast of Helsinki. Finally in 1999 The Audio-Visual Centre was closed down and the Microfilming Unit was integrated into the library. When everybody else was outsourcing activities newspaper microfilming was taken up in-house and this was a good decision. We can concentrate more on quality matters than before, and take into account the needs of digitisation and OCR. Economy is not the fundamental basis for actions even though it is still an important aspect.

Highlights

  • The Helsinki University Library started the microfilming of Finnish newspapers in 1951 on 35 mm safety film which was cellulose acetate based until the last half of the 1980’s

  • Because of many kinds of problems the filming was given to Helsinki University Photographic Institute, later known as Helsinki University Audio-Visual Centre, where they had more interest in the theoretical aspects of photography

  • In 1999 The Audio-Visual Centre was closed down and the Microfilming Unit was integrated into the library

Read more

Summary

Microfilm storage in Mikkeli

BOXING The master negatives of the first two decades have been in brown cardboard boxes with many kinds of metal reels. The quality has varied and current practice is to use acid-free and lignin-free cardboard boxes for the preservation of microfilms. Boxes 1990-2005 USE We used our master negatives as printing masters until the new millennium. They were used because the library wanted to sell the best possible copies of old films of low technical quality. The second generation is always better than the following ones. This continuous use meant we were familiar with the condition of our microfilms. Torn edge on microfilm Some of the films have a wavy edge, which might be due to the ancient copy machine or shrinkage of the acetate base

Wavy edge
How did we do it?
General assessment
Types of faults and defects
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call