Abstract
Could we have a comparison without the knowledge of the history? Comparison is different from the history of law, as history is involved in each historical event in itself (every law system as a historical fact). Therefore, this historical fact could be both a term of comparison and what is a common unity as a working hypothesis in comparison. This distinction does not exclude that history and comparison are adjoining. Comparative law involves at least two different points of view: in the one hand, we may compare foreign systems with the domestic systems, and in the other hand, we may consider the causal relationship between different systems of law of various legal systems, also in a diachronic and vertical point of view.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
