Abstract
History of medicine has long been present in medical education, and over the previous century much discussion has turned on its relevance as the medical curriculum itself has evolved. The development of history of medicine graduate programmes and the 'social turn' of the 1970s stimulated further debate about the distance between history and medicine. At the same time, separate medical humanities programmes were finding advocates among physicians and medical educators. This article traces these curricular divergences and interactions, and highlights certain historical biases about the aims and audiences for historical instruction that impact the ways history might become more involved with medical humanities programmes.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
