Abstract

Everyone knows the sort of history book that is lionised in America, sanctified in Europe and ignored in Oxford. The process often costs British historiography dear. Were a study of teleologies to go the same way, then readers of the English Historical Review might reasonably sense such a cost because the subject is one of great importance, not only to historical theory but to various enquiries in the human sciences. Teleology (the imposition of a telos or guiding purpose into what Mandelbaum used to call ‘directional narratives’, so that the story bestows meaning on its events by placing them on a journey from a known past to an anticipated future), supplies a test-case in historical hygiene. Concerns about the whig understanding of history or Marxist dialectics often begin, for example, by identifying this contamination. A systematic and structured treatment of the phenomenon that silhouetted its presence and advanced possible alternatives would undoubtedly bear fruit. A pity, then, that this volume fails in both system and structure. By so doing, it misses a significant opportunity.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call