Abstract

To support historians in their work, we need to understand their work‐related needs and propose what is required to support those needs. Although the quantity of digitized historical documents available is increasing, historians' ways of working with the digital documents have not been widely studied, particularly in authentic work settings. To better support the historians' reasoning processes, we investigate history researchers' work tasks as the context of information interaction and examine their cognitive access points into information. The analysis is based on a longitudinal observational research and interviews in a task‐based research setting. Based on these findings in the historians' cognitive space, we build bridges into the document space. By studying the information interactions in real task contexts, we facilitate the provision of task‐specific handles into documents that can be used in designing digital research tools for historians.

Highlights

  • Historical research entails creating a coherent story based on historical materials and facts

  • This section discusses the findings from interviews and observational study. We studied their information interactions related to work tasks, the task goals, and the information needs

  • We used interviews to study the activities according to the task-based information interaction framework, namely (a) task

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Historical research entails creating a coherent story based on historical materials and facts. It is creating new knowledge based on pieces of past information. This method of research is called historical reasoning (Kuhn, Weinstock, & Flaton, 1994). The relations between the information items that the reasoning is based on, and understanding the context in which the historical documents were created, are of importance. Historians’ information environment is currently changing from using original historical information items into using digital surrogates of the originals. The researchers prefer the originals, but historians’ preferences began to change as they increasingly started to consult digital formats (Sinn & Soares, 2014)

Objectives
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call