Abstract

The purpose of the article is to analyze the systemic characteristics of historical identity as a scientific category and to comprehend its substantive core on the basis of the paradigm that dominates in a particular historical period. Methodology. Research methods are based on the fundamental principles of historical and cultural studies analysis. The conceptual methodological core of the research is the system analysis of identity as a complex hierarchical system, self-developing in the chronotopе. The scientific novelty lies in the conceptualization of the phenomenon of historical identity from the standpoint of its temporality in the context of the acceleration of identification processes. The invariant and variable nature of the phenomenon is revealed. Conclusions. Based on the memorial paradigm about the continuity of history in its correlation with time, it is shown that historical identity is a sociology-cultural construct, the key mechanism for the formation of which is the dichotomy of «memory-oblivion».

Highlights

  • The scientific novelty lies in the conceptualization of the phenomenon of historical identity from the standpoint of its temporality in the context of the acceleration of identification processes

  • Based on the memorial paradigm about the continuity of history in its correlation with time, it is shown that historical identity is a sociology-cultural construct, the key mechanism for the formation of which is the dichotomy of «memory-oblivion»

  • Ґрунтуючись на меморіальній парадигмі про безперервність історії в її кореляції з часом, показано, що історична ідентичність є соціокультурним конструктом, механізмом формування якого є дихотомія «пам‘ять-забуття»

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Наукова новизна полягає у концептуалізації феномену історичної ідентичності з позицій його темпоральності в контексті прискорення ідентифікаційних процесів. Ґрунтуючись на меморіальній парадигмі про безперервність історії в її кореляції з часом, показано, що історична ідентичність є соціокультурним конструктом, ключовим механізмом формування якого є дихотомія «пам‘ять–забуття». Based on the memorial paradigm about the continuity of history in its correlation with time, it is shown that historical identity is a sociology-cultural construct, the key mechanism for the formation of which is the dichotomy of «memory-oblivion».

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call