Abstract

Reconstructing historical fire regimes is difficult at the landscape scale, but essential to determine whether modern fires are unnaturally severe. I synthesized evidence across 725,000 ha of montane forests in the San Juan Mountains, Colorado, from forest atlases, forest-reserve reports, fire-scar studies, early reports, and newspaper accounts. Atlases mapped moderate- to high-severity fires during 1850–1909 (~60 years), and 86% of atlas area was attributable to 24 fire years. Historical fire rotations from atlases were mostly 225–360 years for high-severity fires and 133–185 years for moderate- to high-severity fires. Historical low-severity fire from tree-ring data at 33 sites revealed a median fire rotation of 31 years in ponderosa pine, 78 years in dry mixed-conifer, and 113 years in moist mixed-conifer forests. Only 15% of montane sites had “frequent-fire” forests with fire rotations <25 years that kept understory fuels at low levels. Moderate- to high-severity fire rotations were long enough to enable old-growth forests, but short enough to foster heterogeneous landscapes with expanses of recovering forests and openings. About 38–39% is still recovering from the 1850–1909 fires. Large, infrequent severe fires historically enhanced resilience to subsequent beetle outbreaks, droughts, and fires, but have burned at lower rates in the last few decades.

Highlights

  • Evidence about historical fire across large landscapes is needed even though climatic change is shifting fire regimes

  • Historical fire remains relevant as a guide for restoration

  • The problem is that tree-ring reconstructions, the main source of evidence about historical fire regimes, are difficult to execute at scales exceeding

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Evidence about historical fire across large landscapes is needed even though climatic change is shifting fire regimes. Limited landscape-scale evidence is not unusual for montane forests, but this leaves an incomplete and possibly biased perspective on historical fire regimes. The problem is that tree-ring reconstructions, the main source of evidence about historical fire regimes, are difficult to execute at scales exceeding. How can multiple sources be used to reconstruct historical fires and fire severity across large landscapes? Studies typically reported mean/median intervals between fires in a composite list of fire dates found on any tree in a set of trees in a study site These mean or median “composite fire intervals (CFIs)” [9] are based on counts of fires, a rough measure since fires vary substantially in area. If 20 fires together burned area equal to half a study area in 10 years, the fire rotation was an estimated 20 years

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call