Abstract

We estimate and analyze the impact of multiple aggregate demand and aggregate supply shocks in a small macroeconomic model of the economy. The analysis serves two purposes. First, we assess the relative importance of the various shocks in explaining the path of output over the past three decades. Second, we conduct counterfactual policy experiments which show the effects of alternative policies on key macro variables. We find that using the monetary policy tool (reserves or the base) such that constant money growth occurs would have produced superior economic results. Fluctuations in macroeconomic activity are generally explained in terms of shocks to aggregate demand and supply. Many theoretical models suggest a role for both types of shocks. Demand shocks, including but not limited to policy innovations, are typically thought to have real effects in the short-to-medium run but not in the long run. Supply shocks, including resource and technology shocks, have effects in both the short and long runs. Most empirical studies find important effects of both aggregate demand and supply shocks.' Although demand and supply shocks are important conceptually, in applied work the nature of the identified shocks has differed. Some studies identify only one generic shock to aggregate

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.