Abstract

This study examines the practice of human resource accounting challenge of a non-universally accepted model to evaluate or measure human resource. Human resource have been shown by academic scholars as not being properly treated in the financials with one of the reasons for the occurrence of this is due to the fact that there are numerous models for measuring the value of human resource. It is therefore important to examine the issue of measurement of human resource before the level of proper recognition in the financial report. This study critically reviews the historical cost model.Expost facto research method was used with data gotten from audited financial reports of selected listed banks in Nigeria. Regression analysis was used to test the relationship between historical cost of human resource and disclosures information (profitability and total asset). The results of the analysis showed that there is a strong relationship between human resource cost and the statement of profit or loss and statement of financial position.The study recommended that the historical cost model be used in measuring staff cost as it is easy to use, conforms to the historical cost concept of the financials and is currently used in the financials and that human resource cost needs to be capitalized in the statement of financial position and amortized in the statement of profit or loss. Keywords : Human resource accounting, Non-Current Asset, Total Asset, Profitability, Historical Cost Model DOI: 10.7176/RJFA/11-17-14 Publication date: October 31 st 2020

Highlights

  • IntroductionFlamholtz (1971) identified that in 1961 the pioneer in the direction of human resource accounting in the United

  • Background InformationFlamholtz (1971) identified that in 1961 the pioneer in the direction of human resource accounting in the UnitedStates was set-up by William Petty

  • From the result of the test of the second hypothesis, human resource cost has a strong relationship with total asset and influence on the figures represented as assets

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Flamholtz (1971) identified that in 1961 the pioneer in the direction of human resource accounting in the United. The first attempt to value human beings in monetary terms was made by him in 1691. Petty considered that labor was “the father of wealth‟ and it must be included in any estimate of national wealth without fail. The real work started only when behavioral scientists vehemently criticized the conventional accounting practice of not valuing the human resources along with other resources. Accountants and economists realized the fact that an appropriate methodology has to be developed for finding the cost and value of the people to the organization. For a long period of time, a number of experts have worked on it and produced certain models for evaluating human resources

Methods
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call