Historical and translation discourse of Abay in the ethnopedagogic paradigm: features of Analy

Bigaysha Z Akhmetova,Yulia V Islamova,Fatima B Sautieva,Zarema M Mamieva,Aitbibi Sultanovna Orazbayeva

doi:10.46502/issn.1856-7576/2021.15.03.7

Abstract

The article is devoted to the study of Abay's creativity as a historical precedent personality in the context of his ethnopedagogical, historical and translation discourses. Purpose of the work: identifying the essence of Abay's main discourses, analyzing them, determining the contribution of the precedent personality to the historical process of the formation of ethno-identity, as well as clarifying the degree of precedence of the personality and his texts. In the process of analysis, a complex method was used, based on the combination of discursive-historical, cognitive-discursive, and pragmatic-communicative approaches, the method of sociological survey. The results obtained include: description of Abay as a precedent historical personality, widely known for his legislative, social and political activities; a comprehensive analysis of the historical discourse of Abay, the discourse of biy (in Kazakh language), its extralinguistic, cognitive, pragmatic, linguo-stylistic components have been identified and described; the historical character of Abay's translation discourses is established, a comprehensive analysis of such a discourse is carried out, the precedent of the text of Abay's translations is noted. It is concluded that Abay Kunanbaev not only acted as an active historical person who managed to influence the actualization of historical events and their promotion, but also as a poet, translator, who created various discourses (historical, translation, literary). Abay's translation discourse acts as a kind of historical discourse - historical and literary discourse, since it has signs of historicity (created by a historical person, it reflects the features of the historical era). Therefore, these discourses can be analyzed based on a complex discursive-historical and cognitive-discursive approaches.

Highlights

Understanding the role of an individual in the historical process is one of the urgent problems of the country in the context of the formation of ethnoidentity
It is assumed that the following tasks will be solved: 1) to consider the historical and translation discourse of Abay as a set of historical and translation texts, and to analyze their features in the aspect of the ethnopedagogic paradigm; 2) to find out the role of Abay in the history of the country and in the development of ethno-cultural pedagogical potential for Kazakhstan; 3) to find out the degree of precedent of the discursive personality of Abay and indicate the relationship with the cultures of other peoples with the definition of the layer of background knowledge marking the reference points of the formation of selfidentification of Kazakhs
Kunanbayev, folk parables, tales, legends, proverbs, and sayings were included in textbooks on the Kazakh language and literature, history and culture of Kazakhstan

Summary

Introduction

Understanding the role of an individual in the historical process is one of the urgent problems of the country in the context of the formation of ethnoidentity. This is due, firstly, to the little-studied question of the importance of an individual in the history of the state. Socio-cultural and ethnopedagogic matrices are mobile under the influence of aggressive external factors (Karabulatova et al, 2017), the growing interest in the problem of personality is explained by the formation of new paradigms of the functional and communicative direction in the XXI century (Sautieva et al, 2020; Vorozhbitova et al, 2019) of the anthropocentric paradigm of scientific knowledge (Savchuk et al, 2019). It is assumed that the following tasks will be solved: 1) to consider the historical and translation discourse of Abay as a set of historical and translation texts, and to analyze their features in the aspect of the ethnopedagogic paradigm; 2) to find out the role of Abay in the history of the country and in the development of ethno-cultural pedagogical potential for Kazakhstan; 3) to find out the degree of precedent of the discursive personality of Abay and indicate the relationship with the cultures of other peoples with the definition of the layer of background knowledge marking the reference points of the formation of selfidentification of Kazakhs

Objectives

Methods

Results

Discussion

Conclusion