Abstract

Advances in imaging and early cancer detection have increased interest in magnetic resonance (MR) guided focused ultrasound (MRgFUS) technologies for cancer treatment. MRgFUS ablation treatments could reduce surgical risks, preserve organ tissue and function, and improve patient quality of life. However, surgical resection and histological analysis remain the gold standard to assess cancer treatment response. For non-invasive ablation therapies such as MRgFUS, the treatment response must be determined through MR imaging biomarkers. However, current MR biomarkers are inconclusive and have not been rigorously evaluated against histology via accurate registration. Existing registration methods rely on anatomical features to directly register in vivo MR and histology. For MRgFUS applications in anatomies such as liver, kidney, or breast, anatomical features that are not caused by the treatment are often insufficient to drive direct registration. We present a novel MR to histology registration workflow that utilizes intermediate imaging and does not rely on anatomical MR features being visible in histology. The presented workflow yields an overall registration accuracy of 1.00 ± 0.13 mm. The developed registration pipeline is used to evaluate a common MRgFUS treatment assessment biomarker against histology. Evaluating MR biomarkers against histology using this registration pipeline will facilitate validating novel MRgFUS biomarkers to improve treatment assessment without surgical intervention. While the presented registration technique has been evaluated in a MRgFUS ablation treatment model, this technique could be potentially applied in any tissue to evaluate a variety of therapeutic options.

Highlights

  • Tumor fractions that can be derived relative to the magnetic resonance (MR) and histology spaces i­ndependently[13]

  • There is a critical need for a new registration method that uses intermediate imaging steps in lieu of feature correlation to account for the deformations incurred at every step of the histology tissue preparation process, allowing the accurate registration of in vivo MR and histology to evaluate MRgFUS treatment imaging biomarkers

  • The histology volume represents the label of tissue necrosis against which the acute and post non-perfused volume (NPV) MR biomarkers were independently compared to determine their accuracy

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Tumor fractions that can be derived relative to the MR and histology spaces i­ndependently[13]. There is a critical need for a new registration method that uses intermediate imaging steps in lieu of feature correlation to account for the deformations incurred at every step of the histology tissue preparation process, allowing the accurate registration of in vivo MR and histology to evaluate MRgFUS treatment imaging biomarkers. This rigorous, spatially accurate registration technique will enable the development of the rigorously validated imaging biomarkers required for the non-invasive treatment of cancer with MRgFUS. After paraffin wax embedding, each block face is trimmed using a microtome until a full section of tissue is exposed (’facing the block’), and sections are collected for histology and the remaining tissue is set Scientific Reports | (2021) 11:18923 |

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call