Histology, OCT, and Micro-CT Evaluation of Coronary Calcification Treated With Intravascular Lithotripsy: Atherosclerotic Cadaver Study

Abstract

Listen

Translate article

BackgroundAlthough intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) has been an emerging novel option to treat vascular calcification, the specific effects on histology have not been systematically examined. ObjectivesThe authors examined the histologic effects of IVL on coronary calcified lesions from human autopsy hearts and evaluated the diagnostic ability of optical coherence tomography (OCT) and micro-computed tomography (CT) to detect calcium fracture as identified by the gold standard histology. MethodsEight coronary lesions were treated with IVL, and 7 lesions were treated with 10 atm inflation using an IVL catheter balloon without lithotripsy pulses (plain old balloon angioplasty [POBA]). OCT and micro-CT imaging were performed before and after treatment, and the presence of calcium fracture was assessed. The frequency and size of fractures were measured and compared with the corresponding histology. ResultsAll 15 treated lesions were diagnosed as sheet calcium by histology. Histological evidence of calcium fracture was significantly greater in the IVL group compared with the POBA group (62.5% vs 0.0%; P = 0.01). Calcified lesions with fracture had a larger maximum arc degree of calcification (median 145.6 [IQR: 134.4-300.4] degrees vs 107.0 [IQR: 88.9-129.1] degrees; P = 0.01). Micro-CT and histology showed an excellent correlation for fracture depth (R2 = 0.83; P < 0.0001), whereas OCT showed less correlation (R2 = 0.37; P = 0.11). The depth of fractures measured by OCT were significantly shorter than with those measured by histology (0.49 [IQR: 0.29-0.77] mm vs 0.88 [IQR: 0.64-1.07] mm; P = 0.008). ConclusionsIVL demonstrated a histologically superior fracturing effect on coronary calcified lesions compared with POBA. OCT failed to identify the presence of some calcium fractures and underestimated the depth of fracture when compared with micro-CT.