Abstract

AIM: to find histological prognostic factors for survival in patients with anorectal melanoma.PATIENTS AND METHODS: single center retrospective study of histological specimens of patients with anorectal melanoma (2005-2023). A revision of histological specimens was carried out, using the following criteria: multifocal growth, maximum tumor size, maximum thickness by Breslow, ulceration, perineural and lymphovascular invasion, as well as depth of invasion. Statistical processing was carried out using the Cox regression.RESULTS: twenty-one patients were included in the study. In all patients, treatment started with surgery: 13 (61.9%) — abdominoperineal excision (APE); 8 (28.1%) — local excision). The sample contained patients with the following initial stages of the process: IB–IIB — 12 (57.1%); III — 9 (42.9%). Nine (42.9%) patients developed local recurrence, and 8 (38.1%) — distant metastases. On univariate analysis, DFS was significantly affected by ulceration RR 0.061 (CI 95.0%; 0.004–0.097, p = 0.048), there was a trend towards the role of neurotropism RR 3.654 (CI 95.0%; 0.934–14.297, p = 0.063) and pigmentation RR 2.485 (CI 95.0%; 0.832–7.424, p = 0.103). In multivariate analysis, none of the criteria had a significant effect on DFS. On OS in univariate analysis was a trend towards an effect of Breslow invasion depth of more than 2 cm HR 1.028 (CI 95.0%; 0.998–1.060, p = 0.070) and depth of tumor invasion HR 2.117 (CI 95.0%; 0.990–4.525, p = 0.053). In multivariate analysis, none of the criteria had a significant effect on OS.CONCLUSION: evaluation of the effectiveness by histological features of skin melanoma showed the potential use of neurotropism, Breslow invasion of more than 2 cm and depth of tumor invasion as factors of unfavorable impact on DFS and OS in ARM. More trials are needed.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call