Histologic and histomorphometric evaluation of peri‐implant bone of immediate or delayed occlusal‐loaded non‐splinted implants in the posterior mandible – an experimental study in monkeys

Abstract

The primary aim of this study was to compare the bone reaction around immediate-loaded non-splinted single implants vs. delayed loaded non-splinted single implants placed in healed ridges in the posterior mandible. Six adult Macaca Fascicularis monkeys were used in this study. The first and second premolars and the first molar were extracted in both sides of the mandible. After 3months of healing, four implants (Replace Select Tapered; Nobel Biocare, Gothenburg, Sweden) with a moderately rough surface (TiUnite, Nobel Biocare) were placed in the edentulous areas of each monkey, two in each side. The implants had a length of 10mm and a diameter of 3.5mm. Four groups of varying time and occlusal loading aspects were created: (i) control group: implant placed non-loaded for 3months; (ii) immediate loaded: implant placed and loaded immediately for 3months; (iii) immediate loaded: implant placed and loaded immediately for 6months; and (iv) delayed loaded: implant placed submerged for 3months and then loaded for 3months. At the loaded implants, after a second stage surgery, a composite crown was made directly on an abutment mounted on the implant reinsuring simultaneous occlusal contact on the implant crown and the neighboring teeth. After euthanization of the animals, histologic specimens were quantified in the light microscope. All implants were clinically, radiographically, and histologically osseointegrated at the time of euthanization and with only mild signs of inflammation in the peri-implant mucosa. The histologic marginal bone level was located on average 1.14-1.74mm apical to the margin of the implants in the various groups. The average bone-to-implant contact (BIC) varied between 55% and 65% and the average bone density (i.e., the proportion of mineralized bone tissue from the implant surface and to a distance of 1mm lateral to the implant) varied between 30.6% and 34.2%. No statistical significant differences between groups were observed in the above-stated histomorphometric parameters. Similar histologic and histomorphometric findings were observed in immediately and delayed loaded non-splinted implants placed in the posterior mandible of macaque monkeys.