Abstract

Introduction Gastric antral vascular ectasia (GAVE) is the underlying cause for 4% of nonvariceal upper GI bleeding. Nodular GAVE and gastric hyperplastic polyps have similar appearance on upper GI endoscopy (EGD) as well as histology, which could delay specific targeted therapy. We herein, through this case, would like to highlight that high clinical suspicion is required to diagnose nodular GAVE. Case Report A 70-year-old male with a past medical history significant for coronary artery disease s/p drug-eluting stent placement on Plavix, coronary artery bypass grafting, mechanical aortic valve replacement on warfarin, and iron deficiency anemia on replacement was admitted for the evaluation of fatigue and melena for a month. Physical examination was positive for black stool. The only significant lab was a drop in hemoglobin/hematocrit (Hg/dl/H%) of 10/32 to 4/12.5. Fibrosure was sought which suggested that the patient had an F4 cirrhosis. Endoscopy showed nodules in the gastric antrum which were presumptively treated as GAVE with argon plasma coagulation (APC). Surgical pathology showed reactive gastropathy and gastric polyps. Review of the past histology suggested that because of the overlap in the histopathological features of hyperplastic polyps and GAVE, they were misinterpreted as hyperplastic polyp rather than nodular GAVE. Discussion GAVE can be classified endoscopically as punctate, striped, nodular, or polypoidal form. The light microscopic findings considered specific to GAVE are vascular hyperplasia, mucosal vascular ectasia, intravascular fibrin thrombi, and fibromuscular hyperplasia. However, these findings do not differentiate GAVE from hyperplastic gastric polyp. The first line of treatment for GAVE is endoscopic ablation with Nd:YAG laser or argon plasma coagulation. Response to therapy was seen with a mean of 2.6 treatment sessions. There is not a lot of evidence supportive of pharmacological treatment of GAVE with estrogen-progesterone, tranexamic acid, and thalidomide. Serial endoscopic band ligation as well as detachable snares in the management of nodular GAVE refractory to argon plasma coagulation has also been tried. Conclusion Oftentimes, there is a delay in the diagnosis and treatment of nodular GAVE as the histopathological appearance could be similar to gastric polyps. The diagnosis of GAVE especially nodular GAVE requires a high level of clinical suspicion. Misdiagnosis of nodular GAVE can delay targeted therapy and have fatal outcomes.

Highlights

  • Gastric antral vascular ectasia (GAVE) is the underlying cause for 4% of nonvariceal upper GI bleeding

  • Present a case of a 70-year-old male who was found to have nodules in the gastric antrum, which based on their endoscopic appearance and histological features were initially diagnosed as gastric hyperplastic polyps but were later confirmed as nodular GAVE

  • Fibrosure was sought which suggested that the patient had an F4 fibrosis. e presence of chronic iron deficiency anemia, melena, cirrhosis, and nodular appearance with vascular ectasia in the antral region on endoscopy lead to the diagnosis of nodular GAVE in our patient despite the absence of histopathological confirmation. e patient responded to argon plasma coagulation (APC), and the hemoglobin level at discharge was 10 g/dl and the Hct level was 31.6%. e patient continued to maintain Hb > 7 and received a second session of APC in June 2018

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Gastric antral vascular ectasia (GAVE) is the underlying cause for 4% of nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding [1]. GAVE is characterized by tortuous, dilated vessels in the gastric antrum. It has a characteristic flat, striped erythematous appearance involving the gastric antrum, but it could present as nodules [2]. Nodular GAVE and gastric hyperplastic polyps have similar appearance on endoscopy as well as histology [3]. Present a case of a 70-year-old male who was found to have nodules in the gastric antrum, which based on their endoscopic appearance and histological features were initially diagnosed as gastric hyperplastic polyps but were later confirmed as nodular GAVE

Case Report
Discussion
Findings
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call