Abstract

Gastric cancers comprise molecularly heterogeneous diseases; four molecular subtypes were identified in the cancer genome atlas (TCGA) study, with implications in patient management. In our efforts to devise a clinically feasible means of subtyping, we devised an algorithm based on histology and five stains available in most academic pathology laboratories. This algorithm was used to subtype our cohort of 107 gastric cancer patients from a single institution (St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto, Canada), which was divided into 3 cases of EBV-positive, 23 of MSI, 27 of GS and 54 of CIN tumours. 87% of the tumours with diffuse histology were classified as GS subtype, which was notable for younger age. Examining for characteristic molecular features, aberrant p53 immunostaining was seen most frequently in the CIN subtype (43% in CIN vs. 6% in others), whereas ARID1A loss was rarely seen (6% vs. 35% in others). HER2 overexpression was seen exclusively in CIN tumours (17% of CIN tumours). PD-L1 positivity was seen predominantly in the EBV and MSI tumours. As with the TCGA study, no survival differences were seen between the subtypes. A similar strategy was employed to approximate the Asian Cancer Research Group (ACRG) molecular subtyping, with the addition of p53 IHC to the algorithm. We observed rates of ARID1A loss and HER2 overexpression that were comparable to the ACRG study. In summary, our algorithm allowed for clinically feasible means of subtyping gastric carcinoma that recapitulated the key molecular features reported in the large scale studies.

Highlights

  • Cristescu et al subcategorized their cohort of 300 gastric adenocarcinoma (GAc) (the Asian Cancer Research Group (ACRG) cohort) into four molecular subtypes, and their classification was prognostic across a number of different cohorts examined, including the the cancer genome atlas (TCGA) cohort [3]

  • We identified cases of gastric adenocarcinoma treated at the St

  • The microsatellite unstable (MSI) subtypes were identified through abnormal immunohistochemistry (IHC) for mismatch repair (MMR) pathway proteins, MLH1, PMS2, MSH2 and MSH6, which strongly correlate with MSI-high status [7, 8]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Cristescu et al subcategorized their cohort of 300 GAc (the Asian Cancer Research Group (ACRG) cohort) into four molecular subtypes, and their classification was prognostic across a number of different cohorts examined, including the TCGA cohort [3]. In an effort to devise a clinically feasible strategy, Kim et al had described a ten-stain panel, using EBER, mismatch repair (MMR) proteins (MLH1, PMS2, MSH2, and MSH6), receptor tyrosine kinases (HER2, EGFR, and MET), PTEN, and p53 protein [4]. This panel is extensive, with a number of immunostains (i.e. EGFR, MET, PTEN) that are not routinely utilized in surgical pathology. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada), we compared the clinical and molecular features of the approximate molecular subtypes and examined the impact on patient survival

Methods
Results
Discussion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call